AutoMapper
xUnit
AutoMapper | xUnit | |
---|---|---|
29 | 36 | |
9,780 | 4,040 | |
0.6% | 1.2% | |
7.7 | 9.2 | |
5 days ago | 4 days ago | |
C# | C# | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
AutoMapper
-
Object Mapping in .NET
AutoMapper
-
Is AutoMapper 13.0 available?
The 13.0 Upgrade Guide page was created back in April, but there is no sign of the release yet.
- New Google Bard Update (can run code)
-
Is there a better way to map data in ASP ?
The most well-know is probably AutoMapper, but it's not universally liked.
- AutoMapper's open source code of conduct
-
Nightclub Website
AutoMapper - well for automapping
-
How to avoid AutoMapper configuration runtime errors
When working with AutoMapper, we often bump into runtime errors due to invalid mapping configuration, such as this one:
-
How to Build a WEB API ASP.NET Core 6
What problems will resolve automapper?
-
LINQ Formatters
If you are a fan of data mappers, you might want to enhance the implementation with additional extension methods. Here is an example for AutoMapper.
-
We released a new version of ShapeShift (0.4.0) - A lightweight Kotlin first library for Object Mapping. Would love to hear your thoughts!
I'm wondering myself. Most mappers like https://automapper.org/ will make a best effort mapper automatically via introspection. If this is just a DSL/annotation suite that requires explicit, complete mapping implementations then this strikes me as a re-implementation of parts of kotlin in kotlin.
xUnit
-
Optimizing C# code analysis for quicker .NET compilation
Several well-known NuGet packages such as xUnit.net, FluentAssertions, StyleCop, Entity Framework Core, and others include by default a significant number of Roslyn analyzers. They help you adhere to the conventions and best practices of these libraries.
-
Integration testing in Umbraco 10+: Validating document types
Most of my rules apply to document types, so let's build some tests for document types. We start by creating a new test class and a new test function and getting a list of all document types. This test is created using xUnit and FluentAssertions:
-
Comprehensive Unit Testing: A Line-by-Line Approach
xUnit -> https://xunit.net/
-
CI/CD Pipeline Using GitHub Actions: Automate Software Delivery
.NET / xUnit / NUnit / MSTest
-
Fluent Assertions: Fluently Assert the Result of .NET Tests
This library extends the traditional assertions provided by frameworks like MSTest, NUnit, or XUnit by offering a more extensive set of extension methods. Fluent Assertions supports a wide range of types like collections, strings, and objects and even allows for more advanced assertions like throwing exceptions.
-
FluentValidation in .NET
You can verify the functionality of this validator by writing the following tests (using xUnit):
-
Running a XUnit test with C#?
The git repo has other runners. AssemblyRunner appears to be the best fit for an already compiled tests project, but there is a runner that can be wrapped into an MSBuild task for example.
-
Setting up a simple testing project with C#
At this point you're going to see a familiar screen asking you to select a project. Here we're looking for a test project. By default, Visual Studio gives you access to 3 different testing frameworks based on your choice of project. These are MSTest, XUnit and NUnit. Ultimately, all 3 of these testing accomplish the same thing, and I've worked with all of them at various points in my career. The difference is mainly in exact syntax and documentation. Although, it's generally considered that MSTest is a little "older" than NUnit or XUnit, so I tend to see it less now. For the purposes of this demo, I'm going to go with NUnit:
-
Integration tests for AWS serverless solution
xUnit unit tests tool
-
Test-Driven Development
Use a testing framework: Utilize a testing framework like NUnit, xUnit, or MSTest to create, organize, and run your tests. These frameworks provide a consistent way to write tests, generate test reports, and integrate with continuous integration tools.
What are some alternatives?
Mapster - A fast, fun and stimulating object to object Mapper
Shouldly - Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!
mapperly - A .NET source generator for generating object mappings. No runtime reflection.
NUnit - NUnit Framework
GraphQL for .NET - GraphQL for .NET
Fluent Assertions - A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
Mapping Generator - :arrows_counterclockwise: "AutoMapper" like, Roslyn based, code fix provider that allows to generate mapping code in design time.
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
Hot Chocolate - Welcome to the home of the Hot Chocolate GraphQL server for .NET, the Strawberry Shake GraphQL client for .NET and Banana Cake Pop the awesome Monaco based GraphQL IDE.
NSubstitute - A friendly substitute for .NET mocking libraries.
ExpressMapper - Mapping .Net types
MSTest - MSTest framework and adapter