Audacia.Random
Random data generation library (by audaciaconsulting)
Roslynator
Roslynator is a set of code analysis tools for C#, powered by Roslyn. (by dotnet)
| Audacia.Random | Roslynator | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2,982 | |
| - | 1.2% | |
| 3.1 | 9.3 | |
| 7 months ago | 6 days ago | |
| C# | C# | |
| MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Audacia.Random
Posts with mentions or reviews of Audacia.Random.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-26.
-
How to write clear and robust unit tests: the dos and don'ts
This point doesn't prohibit you from using randomised information, and Audacia even have an open-source repo of extension methods to help generate randomised information, so long as you're randomising information that has no effect on the outcome of the test.
Roslynator
Posts with mentions or reviews of Roslynator.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-07.
-
Roslynator VS Metalama - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 7 Dec 2023
-
does anyone have a working csharp-language-server setup they can share?
There's also this project https://github.com/JosefPihrt/Roslynator that can add even more analyzers.
-
What do you think about formatting contents in parenthesis like contents in braces?
It does. Nearly every style guide I've seen for any language that allows this prefers this style. I personally prefer it when such structures are needed, but would suggest following it just for consistency and the practical benefits.
-
top 5 things every c# developer should know
Roslynator.Analyzers
-
How to write clear and robust unit tests: the dos and don'ts
The reason I say 'similar' above is that though you may treat it as production code, there are some things in the nature of writing tests that may require different coding standard to be enforced. A good example of this is the RCS1046 analyzer, enforcing names of asynchronous methods to be suffixed with 'Async'; in this case it would be acceptable to override this rule (with an .editorconfig for example) so that you're method name continues to describe the behaviour of the application, and we don't have tests named like public async Task My_descriptive_method_name_async().
-
Linting async method declarations
You can write Roslyn analyzer but you can also simply use this set of analyzers: https://github.com/JosefPihrt/Roslynator. It has analyzers for both async method not ending with Async and non-async methods ending with Async.
-
Is my code hard to read?
My suggestion is to look into installing Roslynator or Sonarlint. Both are free and work with either Visual Studio or VS Code. With them you can right click on your solution and Run Analysis and it will give you a list of "code smells" and automatic fixes for many of them. They are great tools for any dev.
-
Visual Studio vs. Jetbrains Rider Performance
Roslynator while not exactly as good as full R# does a pretty good job for the analysis and refactoring hints imo. Paired with Intellicode + NCrunch (paid) so far has been a good enough experience for us.
-
Which code convention would you choose between these two as best practice?
I prefer the second and roslynator would give RCS1124: Inline local variable1 for the first one.
-
What NuGet packages do you automatically add
Roslynator.Analyzers
What are some alternatives?
When comparing Audacia.Random and Roslynator you can also consider the following projects:
pose - Replace any .NET method (including static and non-virtual) with a delegate
StyleCopAnalyzers - An implementation of StyleCop rules using the .NET Compiler Platform
awesome-dotnet-tips - Curated list of awesome tips and tricks, resources, videos and articles in .net, software architecture, microservice and cloud-native
sonar-dotnet-vscode - Sonar Dotnet is an Visual Studio Code extensions to C#
omnisharp-roslyn - OmniSharp server (HTTP, STDIO) based on Roslyn workspaces
Refactoring Essentials - Refactoring Essentials for Visual Studio
AxoCover - Nice and free .Net code coverage support for Visual Studio with OpenCover.
VsVIM - Vim Emulator Plugin for Visual Studio 2015+
DevSkim - DevSkim is a set of IDE plugins, language analyzers, and rules that provide security "linting" capabilities.
OzCode - Demos that show the power of OzCode
Microsoft.Unity.Analyzers - Roslyn analyzers for Unity game developers
VSColorOutput - Color highlighting to Visual Studio's Build and Debug Output Windows
Audacia.Random vs pose
Roslynator vs StyleCopAnalyzers
Audacia.Random vs awesome-dotnet-tips
Roslynator vs sonar-dotnet-vscode
Roslynator vs omnisharp-roslyn
Roslynator vs Refactoring Essentials
Roslynator vs AxoCover
Roslynator vs VsVIM
Roslynator vs DevSkim
Roslynator vs OzCode
Roslynator vs Microsoft.Unity.Analyzers
Roslynator vs VSColorOutput