Audacia.Random VS pose

Compare Audacia.Random vs pose and see what are their differences.

Audacia.Random

Random data generation library (by audaciaconsulting)

pose

Replace any .NET method (including static and non-virtual) with a delegate (by tonerdo)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
Audacia.Random pose
1 1
4 1,068
- -
3.1 0.0
7 months ago over 1 year ago
C# C#
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Audacia.Random

Posts with mentions or reviews of Audacia.Random. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-26.
  • How to write clear and robust unit tests: the dos and don'ts
    2 projects | dev.to | 26 Oct 2022
    This point doesn't prohibit you from using randomised information, and Audacia even have an open-source repo of extension methods to help generate randomised information, so long as you're randomising information that has no effect on the outcome of the test.

pose

Posts with mentions or reviews of pose. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Best practices can slow your application down
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Mar 2021
    It sounds like the team is interested in adding more automated tests, but are blocked by static singletons, which have high performance but also high coupling, resulting in poor testability.

    I'm sure they've heard of test libraries like MS Fakes and [Pose](https://github.com/tonerdo/pose); I wonder if these libraries would let them maintain high performance, and only introduce the required layer of indirection during testing?

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Audacia.Random and pose you can also consider the following projects:

Roslynator - Roslynator is a set of code analysis tools for C#, powered by Roslyn.

NSubstitute - A friendly substitute for .NET mocking libraries.

awesome-dotnet-tips - Curated list of awesome tips and tricks, resources, videos and articles in .net, software architecture, microservice and cloud-native

Ryujinx - Experimental Nintendo Switch Emulator written in C#

WireMock.Net - WireMock.Net is a flexible product for stubbing and mocking web HTTP responses using advanced request matching and response templating. Based on the functionality from http://WireMock.org, but extended with more functionality.

ASP.NET Boilerplate - ASP.NET Boilerplate - Web Application Framework

FakeItEasy - The easy mocking library for .NET