0x0 VS speedtest

http://0x0.st works for me

Minimal file hosts like https://catbox.moe or http://0x0.st work nice in my opinion, here's an example link: https://files.catbox.moe/zamm2d.jpg

The only catch is most of them set a time limit on uploads, but you might be able to (ab)use archive.org if you want the files to stay online forever.

Looks similar to 0x0.st

major OOPS here, ( I feel like the sorcerer's apprentice)expression "curl -F'[email protected]' https://0x0.st" returns message that "-F" is badly used, and trying it without the "-F" results in failure . . . oops!

I dont use go$hit drive so I use 0x0.st to upload files for sharing (it uses curl).

curl -F'[email protected]' https://0x0.st

# censor usernames from log sed -iE "s/$USER/$(printf "%${#USER}s")/g" mem.log` # upload curl -F'[email protected]' https://0x0.st

> It was purely decorative, but ugly decoration that only appealed to other brutalist architects, meant to trick people into thinking it was some "raw" construction element sticking out.

That's really funny, because I've seen websites that tries to appeal to "hacker"/"minimalist" aesthetics doing the same thing.

An example: the file-hosting service https://0x0.st. When you try to visit a link to a non-existing file, it will crash with a trace message that exposes the offending code block from `fhost.c`.

Wow, so RAW and BRUTAL. It's even written in C, so hacker-ish! Until you find out that the error message is _fake_: https://git.0x0.st/mia/0x0/src/branch/master/templates/404.h...

The server is actually written in Python and it generates a randomized, fake C-looking trace message for its 404 page.

I'm going to go on a limb and say it's automod because of my file host ( https://0x0.st ) also testing if this comment gets removed or not

First cd into the log directory and run the following command. curl -F '[email protected]' https://0x0.st

> https://speed.cloudflare.com

Love this. I'm used to use speedtest.net back in the day, but this is so much better in so many ways and provides so much more data.

Followup: I just tested OpenWrt 23.05.2 + luci-app-sqm + cake with https://speed.cloudflare.com/

With the limit set to 1 Mbps (1000/1000), my upload latency dropped from 80ms to 25ms, but speed was hard-limited to 1000/1000. With the limit rasied to 1G/1G, cake stopped working and my upload latency returned to 80ms.

So I stand by my original comment. You still have to configure the speed limits manually.

This is helpful, thank you. We weren't expecting anything being routed through a wall, just a longer cable. Speeds right next to the router on my phone were still like 20Mbps. I will try creating the two networks and seeing if that helps, though I still think there is something wrong with how it was set up. I've been using cloudflare (https://speed.cloudflare.com) for the tests which is in Mbps.

Cloudflare have got one now too.

What packet loss are you experiencing? Are you on wifi? If you do this test, do you see any packet loss here too?

There's nothing wrong with router or my internet connection, as I mentioned before I tried to download different files through browser and got expected speeds. Services like https://speed.cloudflare.com or https://www.speedtest.net return expected speeds of 500-600 Mbit/s (tried different servers)

I was semi-OK with the Powerlines, but the speed lose (I have 1 gigabit by my ISP, yeah, 300Mbps are all needed usually, but something itched me about losing speed just because; also, I wanted something a little more future-proof than being limited to 250-300Mbps top). Also, speed.cloudflare.com was giving me "Average"/"Good" results and IDK why, because using ethernet, my connection was always "Great"