0x0 VS Baserow

http://0x0.st works for me

Minimal file hosts like https://catbox.moe or http://0x0.st work nice in my opinion, here's an example link: https://files.catbox.moe/zamm2d.jpg

The only catch is most of them set a time limit on uploads, but you might be able to (ab)use archive.org if you want the files to stay online forever.

Looks similar to 0x0.st

major OOPS here, ( I feel like the sorcerer's apprentice)expression "curl -F'[email protected]' https://0x0.st" returns message that "-F" is badly used, and trying it without the "-F" results in failure . . . oops!

I dont use go$hit drive so I use 0x0.st to upload files for sharing (it uses curl).

curl -F'[email protected]' https://0x0.st

# censor usernames from log sed -iE "s/$USER/$(printf "%${#USER}s")/g" mem.log` # upload curl -F'[email protected]' https://0x0.st

> It was purely decorative, but ugly decoration that only appealed to other brutalist architects, meant to trick people into thinking it was some "raw" construction element sticking out.

That's really funny, because I've seen websites that tries to appeal to "hacker"/"minimalist" aesthetics doing the same thing.

An example: the file-hosting service https://0x0.st. When you try to visit a link to a non-existing file, it will crash with a trace message that exposes the offending code block from `fhost.c`.

Wow, so RAW and BRUTAL. It's even written in C, so hacker-ish! Until you find out that the error message is _fake_: https://git.0x0.st/mia/0x0/src/branch/master/templates/404.h...

The server is actually written in Python and it generates a randomized, fake C-looking trace message for its 404 page.

I'm going to go on a limb and say it's automod because of my file host ( https://0x0.st ) also testing if this comment gets removed or not

First cd into the log directory and run the following command. curl -F '[email protected]' https://0x0.st

4. Baserow - 1.5k ⭐️

GitLab repository: https://gitlab.com/bramw/baserow.

💬 Follow us at @baserow on Twitter for staying in the known of all company updates and news. ⌨️ Join the Baserow community forum to chat with other developers and the Baserow team. ⭐️ Star Baserow on GitLab to show your appreciation of our work.

Check out the full roundup: https://baserow.io/blog/1-14-release-of-baserow. Test out Baserow 1.14: https://baserow.io. GitLab repository: Bram Wiepjes / baserow · GitLab.

Baserow

I'd also written an article on token authentication for django: https://www.spapas.net/2021/08/25/django-token-rest-auth/ using the REST Framework's TokenAuthentication.

This is simplest thing for most cases.

The session authentication that is proposed in the article is also great but has two problems:

* It will be hacky to implement for mobile apps (it should be possible but would not be something I'd like to do, I had tried in the past and remember that I needed to jump to a lot of hoops to "pick" that session cookie)

* The cookies can't be shared between different domains (cookies be shared the same domain or between a parent and child domain, i.e api.example.com can set/get cookies from .example.com).

So you can use the SessionAuthnentication if your frontend and backend share their domain and you know that your API won't ever be used for mobiles apps. On all other cases use TokenAuthentication.

I don't have experience with JWT Authentication, however I know it can be done and is used be various apps f.e baserow: https://gitlab.com/bramw/baserow/-/blob/develop/backend/src/...

Feel free to dig into https://gitlab.com/bramw/baserow repository, e.g. https://gitlab.com/bramw/baserow/-/blob/develop/backend/Dockerfile... There are docker compose files too.

Great idea! I've created an issue for it on the backlog https://gitlab.com/bramw/baserow/-/issues/1399.

Here is the full scoop on all new things: https://gitlab.com/bramw/baserow/-/releases/1.13.1.