SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Top 11 shared-library Open-Source Projects
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
ods-jenkins-shared-library
Shared Jenkins library which all ODS projects & components use - provisioning, SonarQube code scanning, Nexus publishing, OpenShift template based deployments and repository orchestration
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
preloader
Preloader 'pre-loads' dynamically linked executables to speed up their load times (by Theldus)
-
-
godot-library-classes
A collection of independent classes written in GDNative that can be easily added to projects.
https://github.com/friendlyanon/cmake-init This is how you do CMake properly. If you deviate from its install rules you are highly likely to do something wrong.
Personally I prefer INI over nearly all configuration formats.
https://github.com/madmurphy/libconfini/wiki/An-INI-critique...
> On a previous team I had used Concourse CI to some extent, but I wasn’t really blown away by the experience. Travis and Circle were mentioned. I was a fool. I should have committed to seriously researching some of the contenders and making a more informed decision, but I lacked the willpower and the discernment.
The whole post can be summed up as he had very little CICD experience. Made lots of beginner mistakes, which is easy to do in Jenkins. Then decided to write a post where all his complaints about Jenkins are not only wrong but are the issues that plague all the other CICD tools.
> So instead of writing Bash directly, you’re writing Bash inside Groovy
Why are you doing that? You have a fully featured programming language and you are running `sh('npm install')`. You could do this instead https://github.com/DontShaveTheYak/jenkins-std-lib/blob/mast... . How is bash inside of YAML better?
> The trouble is: Groovy is a much, much worse language for executing commands than Bash. Bash is interpreted, has a REPL that is great for experimentation, does require a ton of imports, and has lightweight syntax. Groovy has none of these things.
Groovy has a language server, linters and a vscode IDE plugins. They are probably not as stable or full featured as the bash ones, but they are available and very few take advantage of them. Again, how is YAML+Bash better?
> The way that developers test their Groovy steps is by triggering a job on the remote Jenkins server to run them. The feedback loop is 2 orders of magnitude slower than it is for just executing Bash locally.
This is a rookie mistake. For about 60-75% of pipelines you can run them locally in a docker container on your local machine. You can even set up hot code reload so as you change your pipeline the Jenkins reloads it. You can also configure the job to kick off a build when it reloads the code. When Jenkins is configured correctly it has the fastest feedback loop of any CICD tool on the market. GitHub actions comes in a close second since it can also be run locally but you cant run a "clone" of what you run in production, like having the same secrets, so it gets second place. Beside Jenkins and GitHub actions, I dont know of any solutions for the other tools.
You can run a GitHub action on Jenkins. It's a very deep and complex system. It's like an iceberg and so many engineers dont leave the surface before deciding it sucks and one of the YAML CICD tools is better. Sure the YAML alternatives are EASY to get started with and to do basic stuff with. But they are Terrible at anything complex. While Jenkins is not easy to get started with, once mastered, you can build complex pipelines with ease.
I get that I'm a Jenkins fanboy. Most of the things I mentioned above, I either contribute to or I'm the author of. I know Jenkins has issues. I know it has hurt lots of people, I read the complaints online. But it's still the best out there. The best software in the world is not written in bash or yaml and the same is true of the best CICD pipelines in the world. It's a shame very few people get to see/use those pipelines.
Project mention: Mulle-atexit: Compatibility library to fix deficient atexit implementations | news.ycombinator.com | 2023-11-01
You mean project a raycast towards a 3D object under the cursor? Because i made a class for that a while ago: https://github.com/NancokPS2/godot-library-classes/blob/main/Input/Picker3D.gd
NOTE:
The open source projects on this list are ordered by number of github stars.
The number of mentions indicates repo mentiontions in the last 12 Months or
since we started tracking (Dec 2020).
shared-library related posts
-
How do you get the relative mouse position in 3D?
-
Jenkins in kubernetes without docker
-
Which CICD Pipeline is the least hardest to develop from
-
GNUnet Worker Library: Multithreading with GNUnet
-
GNUnet Worker Library: Multithreading with GNUnet
-
An ANSI C library to parse and create PROXY protocol v1 and v2 headers with support for all TLVs including the custom ones from AWS and Azure
-
Not Enough Standards, my C++17/20 library for cross-platform utilities
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 8 May 2024
Index
What are some of the best open-source shared-library projects? This list will help you:
| Project | Stars | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cmake-init | 1,835 |
| 2 | not-enough-standards | 227 |
| 3 | libconfini | 155 |
| 4 | ods-jenkins-shared-library | 68 |
| 5 | jenkins-std-lib | 48 |
| 6 | libproxyprotocol | 11 |
| 7 | dl_api | 8 |
| 8 | preloader | 8 |
| 9 | mulle-atexit | 5 |
| 10 | godot-library-classes | 4 |
| 11 | libgnunetworker | 3 |
Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com