Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →
Top 23 Fuse Open-Source Projects
-
seaweedfs
SeaweedFS is a fast distributed storage system for blobs, objects, files, and data lake, for billions of files! Blob store has O(1) disk seek, cloud tiering. Filer supports Cloud Drive, cross-DC active-active replication, Kubernetes, POSIX FUSE mount, S3 API, S3 Gateway, Hadoop, WebDAV, encryption, Erasure Coding.
-
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
-
-
-
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
-
mountpoint-s3
A simple, high-throughput file client for mounting an Amazon S3 bucket as a local file system.
-
-
-
MooseFS
MooseFS – Open Source, Petabyte, Fault-Tolerant, Highly Performing, Scalable Network Distributed File System (Software-Defined Storage)
-
distribyted
Torrent client with HTTP, fuse, and WebDAV interfaces. Start exploring your torrent files right away, even zip, rar, or 7zip archive contents!
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
Project mention: DwarFS – The Deduplicating Warp-Speed Advanced Read-Only File System | news.ycombinator.com | 2024-04-11Whoops: WebDAV:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39417503
SeaweedFS supports WebDAV. https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/wiki/WebDAV
I'm not able to find if both/restic supports mounting backups as WebDAV, but in theory there's nothing stopping you.
It's 100% user space (expose a rest service) and supported by a bunch of file-browsers with a bit of a network aware component to it as well.
curl --silent --remote-name --location https://github.com/ceph/ceph/raw/octopus/src/cephadm/cephadmchmod a+x cephadm./cephadm bootstrap --mon-ip 192.168.1.41
Project mention: why is my mac able to read the left sd card but not the right? | /r/mac | 2023-12-11Install macFUSE, thank me later: https://osxfuse.github.io
The author needs to ask themselves: in this cloud technology stack, is there POSIX involved somewhere lower down, where I can't access it? The answer is, of course, "yes". The sort of cloud storage systems described all run on top of POSIX APIs. They provide convenience (cost efficiency is more debatable) compared to the POSIX alternative, but that's because they exist at an entirely different conceptual layer (hence the presence of POSIX anyway, just buried).
Your point about surfacing a POSIX that's actually there but hidden and thus visible to low-level Amazon employees building the S3 service which makes it invisible to S3 end customers is true but isn't the the point of the article. The author is saying there are motivations for a POSIX-like api visible also the end user.
So your explanation of stack looks like 2 layers: POSIX api <-- AWS S3 built on top of that
Author's essay is actually talking about 3 layers: POSIX <-- AWS S3 <-- POSIX
That's why the blog post has the following links to POSIX-on-top-of-S3-objects :
https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse
https://github.com/kahing/goofys
https://www.cuno.io/
Super intriguing. Thanks for sharing!
It reminds me a bit of an early Go project called Upspin [1]. And also a bit of Solid [2]. Did you get any inspiration from them?
What excites me about your project is that you're addressing the elephant in the room when it comes to data sovereignty (~nobody wants to self-host a personal database but their personal devices aren't publicly accessible) in an elegant way.
By storing the data on my personal device and (presumably?) paying for a managed relay (and maybe an encrypted backup), I can keep my data in my physical possession, but I won't have to host anything on my own. Is that the idea?
https://upspin.io/
I fixed the problem, it was due to the incorrect setup of the google drive. I followed this guide to set everything up from scratch and create the folder directly in Linux instead of constantly accessing the apparently "encrypted" cloud. If anyone ever runs into the same problem, I really hope this thread is helpful :D
It's not really the same though. A Projected File System copies the files from the backing store to somewhere on the local file system when requested and then performs IO normally on the local files.
For an actual implementation of userspace filesystems on Windows see dokany: https://github.com/dokan-dev/dokany
The author needs to ask themselves: in this cloud technology stack, is there POSIX involved somewhere lower down, where I can't access it? The answer is, of course, "yes". The sort of cloud storage systems described all run on top of POSIX APIs. They provide convenience (cost efficiency is more debatable) compared to the POSIX alternative, but that's because they exist at an entirely different conceptual layer (hence the presence of POSIX anyway, just buried).
Your point about surfacing a POSIX that's actually there but hidden and thus visible to low-level Amazon employees building the S3 service which makes it invisible to S3 end customers is true but isn't the the point of the article. The author is saying there are motivations for a POSIX-like api visible also the end user.
So your explanation of stack looks like 2 layers: POSIX api <-- AWS S3 built on top of that
Author's essay is actually talking about 3 layers: POSIX <-- AWS S3 <-- POSIX
That's why the blog post has the following links to POSIX-on-top-of-S3-objects :
https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse
https://github.com/kahing/goofys
https://www.cuno.io/
... or does "S3 file system" mean https://github.com/awslabs/mountpoint-s3 - a Rust project by AWS Labs that provides "a simple, high-throughput file client for mounting an Amazon S3 bucket as a local file system" ?
Have a look at mergerfs.
I'm looking to improve my documents syncing setup. Currently I'm using owncloud, but that seems overkill for just files syncing and it requires maintenance, so I gave Syncthing a look. The "Untrusted device encryption" was not appealing to me because I'm not convinced by the security aspects yet, and also because it is in beta for now. I used gocryptfs [1] in the past and was quite happy with it, so I'm planning to use it on top of Syncthing to have files synced encrypted. As far as I have read this setup (Syncthing + gocryptfs) seems to be used by several people and has already been discussed by gocryptfs' author, who recommended a `-sharedstorage` flag for such use case [2]. Reading [3] I think gocryptfs is more suited for files syncing than cryfs. I'm aware that the metadata (file size, structure, …) of my files are not encrypted but that's a compromise I'm ready to make.
I would be happy to hear about opinions about this approach.
[1] https://nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/
[2] https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/549#issuecomment...
[3] https://www.cryfs.org/comparison
I know that cryfs[1] is resilient to at least the first of these, and possibly the second as well. I don't know if cryfs allows to modify the base directory while the filesystem is online, if it does then it might already be a better solution for syncthing, if you only care about Linux.
On the flip side syncthing could incorporate cryfs's base directory format instead of their home-grown one.
[1] https://www.cryfs.org/
Project mention: DwarFS – The Deduplicating Warp-Speed Advanced Read-Only File System | news.ycombinator.com | 2024-04-11https://github.com/mhx/dwarfs/blob/main/doc/mkdwarfs.md#nils...
Project mention: What's the most pratical solution for someone who wants to use Linux as their primary OS but often has to deal with Windows-exclusive software and services? | /r/linuxquestions | 2023-12-06onedriver is a native Linux filesystem for Microsoft OneDrive: - https://github.com/jstaf/onedriver
GitHub - whoozle/android-file-transfer-linux: Android File Transfer for Linux
NOTE:
The open source projects on this list are ordered by number of github stars.
The number of mentions indicates repo mentiontions in the last 12 Months or
since we started tracking (Dec 2020).
Fuse related posts
- BTFS (BitTorrent Filesystem)
- DwarFS – The Deduplicating Warp-Speed Advanced Read-Only File System
- Ratarmount: Access large archives as a filesystem efficiently
- Row Zero and Viewport Data Streaming
- why is my mac able to read the left sd card but not the right?
- How do I use multiple hard drives on Kubuntu for steam?
- Please someone save me from file sharing hell to windows
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 26 Apr 2024
Index
What are some of the best open-source Fuse projects? This list will help you:
| Project | Stars | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | seaweedfs | 21,013 |
| 2 | Ceph | 13,233 |
| 3 | osxfuse | 8,528 |
| 4 | s3fs-fuse | 8,065 |
| 5 | winfsp | 6,586 |
| 6 | upspin | 6,225 |
| 7 | google-drive-ocamlfuse | 5,357 |
| 8 | dokany | 5,075 |
| 9 | goofys | 5,031 |
| 10 | mountpoint-s3 | 4,003 |
| 11 | mergerfs | 3,868 |
| 12 | btfs | 3,809 |
| 13 | gocryptfs | 3,291 |
| 14 | gcsf | 2,344 |
| 15 | cryfs | 1,933 |
| 16 | go-fuse | 1,937 |
| 17 | dwarfs | 1,860 |
| 18 | onedriver | 1,749 |
| 19 | plexdrive | 1,726 |
| 20 | MooseFS | 1,583 |
| 21 | android-file-transfer-linux | 1,389 |
| 22 | rust-fuse | 1,028 |
| 23 | distribyted | 1,015 |
Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com