SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more ā
Component Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to component
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition
FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition is a no-nonsense implementation of FizzBuzz made by serious businessmen for serious business purposes.
-
Graal
GraalVM compiles Java applications into native executables that start instantly, scale fast, and use fewer compute resources š
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
awesome-clojure
A curated list of awesome Clojure libraries and resources. Inspired by awesome-... stuff
-
-
-
component discussion
component reviews and mentions
-
A History of Clojure (2020) [pdf]
* Lifecycle management: Mount, Integrant or Component (https://github.com/tolitius/mount https://github.com/weavejester/integrant and https://github.com/stuartsierra/component)
-
Generic functions, a newbie question
When you start to have multiple stateful components (the database, the HTTP server, your Redis connection, a page cache, etc.), then you'll want to use a library like component that manages their (inter-)dependencies and provides a consistent notion of lifecycle.
- What makes Clojure better than X for you?
- Clojure needs a Rails, but not for the reason you think
-
[ANN] Reveal Pro 1.3.308 ā sticker windows for system libraries (component, integrant, mount)
Today I released a new version of Reveal Pro ā dev.vlaaad/reveal-pro {:mvn/version "1.3.308"} ā that adds sticker integration for system libraries such as mount, component and integrant!
-
Printf(ā%s %sā, dependency, injection)
I agree with the main sentiment from the article. Although I do think they are discussing Inversion of control more-so than dependency injection.
One of my first languages was .net and I was never able to really understand DI in that context that well.
Actually using javascript and ducktyping made me understand what it actually was.
I remember a .net job interview where I had to write a micro-service and opted to construct the dependency graph in the main function initialising "all" the classes there. Instead of discussing the pro's and con's of that approach they berated me for not using a DI framework (No I did not land that job, but in hindsight it was the most expensive job interview I've ever had. The room was filled with 8 developers going over my code).
The main thing the article glosses over is state. something people with a functional background hide from. But if you look at something like the httpclient in .net. I think it took the .net world like 10 years to start using the httpclient properly. Scope and lifetime of those kind of objects are important. managing connection pools, retry state, throttling or the incoming http request. DI does make that kind of thing easieR (I'm not saying it makes it better)
Look at clojure's component(https://github.com/stuartsierra/component), I'm not a clojure expert by far. But it is kinda DI/IOC in a functional language.
In closing we can agree that it is underused in the right places and overused in the wrong ones.
- Forcing engineers to release by some arbitrary date results in shipping unfinished code - instead, ship when the code is ready and actually valuable
-
How to pass components across functions
https://github.com/stuartsierra/component#no-function-should-take-the-entire-system-as-an-argument
-
There are a *lot* of actor framework projects on Cargo.
Yeah like I mentioned I'm not like super sold on the everything-should-be-an-actor paradigm, but I find value in DDD + a light implementation of Components (similar to stuartsierra/component).
-
Essential libraries?
https://github.com/stuartsierra/component for managing components lifecycles in projects
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 14 Jan 2025
Stats
stuartsierra/component is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of component is Clojure.