Sbcl Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to sbcl
-
-
-
Scout APM
Scout APM: A developer's best friend. Try free for 14-days. Scout APM uses tracing logic that ties bottlenecks to source code so you know the exact line of code causing performance issues and can get back to building a great product faster.
-
-
common-lisp-jupyter
A Common Lisp kernel for Jupyter along with a library for building Jupyter kernels.
-
-
-
lisp-xl
Common Lisp Microsoft XLSX (Microsoft Excel) loader for arbitrarily-sized / big-size files
-
-
-
cloc
cloc counts blank lines, comment lines, and physical lines of source code in many programming languages.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
medley
The main repo for the Medley Interlisp project. Wiki, Issues are here. Other repositories include maiko (the VM implementation) and Interlisp.github.io (web site sources) (by Interlisp)
-
-
Reviews and mentions
-
The Melancholy Decline of the Semicolon
Why? Code requires comments regardless of language in order to explain the why as opposed to the what. See e.g. https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/search?q=kludge for examples.
-
How to downgrade sbcl?
I am not able to find that version on their site for download and the homebrew repo does not have it either.
-
Is there a reason why the source location of a symbol can't be embedded in the symbol itself?
Here is a post about SBCL’s xref (“cross-reference”) facility from 2006 to get an informal taste. Here is the source code in SBCL itself. This is a portable XREF developed in 1991.
-
Question about Emacs compatibility with Portacle
More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.
-
Which Language?
I'd suggest you consider Common Lisp as well. sbcl is a high-performance actively maintained implementation of Common Lisp.
-
What to Learn
Forth is an interesting case. It's really unproductive to build complex systems with, and this fosters an extreme aversion to extra features and moving parts, and that is a brand of productivity of its own.
Just one simple example. The 'struct' language feature is 1500 LOC in Lisp but only 10 LOC in FORTH (see below.) Are they equivalent? No, the Lisp one has lots of bells and whistles, while the FORTH one is minimalist in the extreme.
If you tried to write the feature-complete Lisp version in FORTH you would probably find it very difficult and unproductive. So you wouldn't do that. And this to me is what FORTH's peculiar brand of efficiency is all about.
Lisp: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/blob/master/src/code/defstruct....
- Sbcl compiling to a VM
-
Implicit Overflow Considered Harmful (and how to fix it)
This makes the logic work out just fine. You can see the implementation here: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/blob/master/src/assembly/x86-64/arith.lisp
-
SBCL problem on Apple Silicon M1
Fixed that in https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/commit/c0a8e074936c869d16696e243b2d42960fb47cff
- SBCL-2.1.9 git repository
-
SBCL-2.1.9 git repo
git clone https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl.git cd sbcl git checkout sbcl-2.1.9 sh make.sh
-
Programming Language and compiler Benchmarks
Thanks for the developers of SBCL.
-
SBCL: New in version 2.1.8
You can also grab it from https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/actions/runs/1182434888
-
SBCL 2.1.7 released
I can show 1 commit about it: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/commit/b91ca63476343516e99382a6ba7a90b257895431
There's also the README: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/blob/b91ca63476343516e99382a6ba7a90b257895431/contrib/sb-graph/readme.org
Stats
sbcl/sbcl is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
Popular Comparisons
Are you hiring? Post a new remote job listing for free.