nosecmem

Demonstrate ability to read memfd_secret() data from the kernel (by JonathonReinhart)

Nosecmem Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to nosecmem

  1. linux

    Linux kernel source tree

  2. Nutrient

    Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers. Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.

    Nutrient logo
  3. platform-compat

    Discontinued Roslyn analyzer that finds usages of APIs that will throw PlatformNotSupportedException on certain platforms.

  4. stronghold.rs

    Stronghold is a secret management engine written in rust.

  5. secrets

    Secure storage for cryptographic secrets in Rust

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better nosecmem alternative or higher similarity.

nosecmem discussion

Log in or Post with

nosecmem reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of nosecmem. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-08-30.

Stats

Basic nosecmem repo stats
5
57
3.1
about 1 year ago

JonathonReinhart/nosecmem is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 only which is an OSI approved license.

The primary programming language of nosecmem is C.

Popular Comparisons


Sponsored
Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers
Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.
www.nutrient.io

Did you know that C is
the 6th most popular programming language
based on number of references?