musl-cross-make

Simple makefile-based build for musl cross compiler (by richfelker)
Add to my DEV experience Musl cross-compiler musl-cross target-musl Gcc binutils Toolchain
Source Code
musl-cross-make Reviews
Suggest alternative
Edit details
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured

Musl-cross-make Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to musl-cross-make

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better musl-cross-make alternative or higher similarity.
Suggest an alternative to musl-cross-make

musl-cross-make reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of musl-cross-make. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-10.
  • Alpine Linux: Brilliant Linux Distro
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 Mar 2022
    I've done the same alpine trick for static binaries but may I introduce you to musl-cross-make?

    https://github.com/richfelker/musl-cross-make

    Just burned out static toolchains that make me static binaries for all architectures gcc supports. Much like musl.cc but they suggest building your own and I do.

    I use these toolchains on debian (/ anywhere a non-ancient linux kernel runs) to make static binaries, you can too!

  • “LLVM-Libc” C Standard Library
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Dec 2021
  • SectorLISP binary footprint comparaison
    3 projects | /r/lisp | 7 Nov 2021
    Python obviously isn't 14kb because its code is divided into hundreds of shared object files. So the way I like to measure things is using static executable size, using tools like https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan or https://github.com/richfelker/musl-cross-make of which you'll find a static build in the cosmo repo. For example, here's the technique I used to build TinyLISP was something like this:
  • Cross compiling ring for arm
    1 project | /r/rust | 1 Oct 2021
    I have a different issue with ring. This is on a custom Cortex A9 board at work. For most depedencies I can get compilation working fine with armv7-unknown-linux-musleabihf. I was able to build the cross compiler using https://github.com/richfelker/musl-cross-make , adding
  • GCC Rust: GCC Front-End for Rust
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 Jan 2021
    A bit off topic, I hope someday GCC's build system gets overhauled. A huge advantage of LLVM is that it is quite easier to rebuild the runtime libraries without rebuilding the compiler. With GCC that's a pain, unless one takes the time to re-package GCC very carefully like https://github.com/richfelker/musl-cross-make and https://exherbo.org/.

    Maybe getting some new GCC devs in there with projects like this would help with that?

  • A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
    www.influxdata.com | 10 May 2024
    Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →

Stats

Basic musl-cross-make repo stats
5
1,189
5.5
about 2 months ago

richfelker/musl-cross-make is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.

The primary programming language of musl-cross-make is Makefile.

Popular Comparisons

  1. musl-cross-make VS manylinux
  2. musl-cross-make VS glibc_version_header
  3. musl-cross-make VS holy-build-box
  4. musl-cross-make VS aports
  5. musl-cross-make VS zwave-js-ui
  6. musl-cross-make VS bootBASIC
  7. musl-cross-make VS AlpineLinux-DailyDriverDesktop
  8. musl-cross-make VS omnios-build
  9. musl-cross-make VS graylog-docker
  10. musl-cross-make VS AlpineLinux-DailyDriverDeskto

Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com