Lem Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to lem
-
emacs-anywhere
Configurable automation + hooks called with application information
-
-
SonarLint
Clean code begins in your IDE with SonarLint. Up your coding game and discover issues early. SonarLint is a free plugin that helps you find & fix bugs and security issues from the moment you start writing code. Install from your favorite IDE marketplace today.
-
-
-
-
cider
The Clojure Interactive Development Environment that Rocks for Emacs (by clojure-emacs)
-
Scout APM
Less time debugging, more time building. Scout APM allows you to find and fix performance issues with no hassle. Now with error monitoring and external services monitoring, Scout is a developer's best friend when it comes to application development.
-
doom-emacs
An Emacs framework for the stubborn martian hacker [Moved to: https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs]
-
-
build-emacs-for-macos
Somewhat hacky script to automate building of Emac.app on macOS.
-
-
-
paip-lisp
Lisp code for the textbook "Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming"
-
Cider
A new cross-platform Apple Music experience based on Electron and Vue.js written from scratch with performance in mind. 🚀
-
-
-
-
lem reviews and mentions
-
Slynk independent client
Here is link number 1 - Previous text "Lem"
I didn't know about CEDAR! I thought there are only these Emacs replicas in Common Lisp: Hemlock and Lem.
-
Emacs for Professionals
well there's a working Emacs-like in Common Lisp! https://github.com/lem-project/lem/
- Lem: About Common Lisp editor/IDE with high expansibility
-
Why You Should Learn Lisp In 2022?
Then, of course, a solution is to run the scripts from our editor… or from a friendly terminal-based interface? There's Lish, the Lem editor (for CL, Python and other languages), friendly REPLs… (cl-repl)
-
What was your favorite Common Lisp release (implementation, library, tool, ...) in 2021?
I was introduced to Lem. It's pretty neat.
-
A Novel Common Lisp Emacs Configuration
Related Emacs-like project: lem
- Lem editor v1.9.2
-
On New IDEs
I like the article, and the conclusion that if nobody takes the challenge, it does not exist. However I think that a lot of people have tried to make things happen, and of course took it as far as they thought necessary or sufficient, things like lem, LispIDE, climacs, and I'm sure there are may others. One of such efforts is what we have come to refer to as EMACS/SLIME, however there is more to it than that. EMACS is by design a good choice as the editor, because it was designed and has evolved with extensibility in mind, SLIME allowed us to connect EMACS to an underlying Common Lisp process, and gives you some extra superpowers, like access to the HyperSpec, Cross Reference, better code inspection tools, etc. We also have paredit or parinfer, auto-complete-mode, and some other things have been developed not just for Common Lisp but in order to accommodate the needs of larger groups of programmers including emacs-lisp programmers. To me EMACS/SLIME or EMACS/SLY (+ other modes) have become the paths of least resistance, both to create and customize a IDE experience, and EMACS will continue to be developed independent of its use as a environment to write lisp programs other than emacs lisp, because there is a loyal group of followers. The connecting tools (emacs minor and major modes) are just pieces of the whole machinery which are easier to maintain than a whole stand alone IDE, and it is kind of natural for common lisp programmers to contribute to the emacs set of solutions, becuase emacs lisp looks a lot like common lisp, I am sure it is not difficult for Scheme programmers to adapt too. The thing here is that the formal coordination of efforts does not exist, so everybody adopts either what they first find (through recommendation, cursory search, or .emacs copying), so there is no clear direction for improving on a single experience, which is what dedicated IDEs do, this also mean that you get to choose your experience, which dilutes the efforts but ends up creating an "survival of the fittest" scenario, where the more widely adopted solutions are the ones that dominate and get more attention and contributions. This is why I always advocate for the EMACS/Slime/Quicklisp/+useful-modes (I'll call it ESQ+) solution, because I think because of the nature of our community, this "natural evolution" has favored that beast. I don't know if the future will provide some other beasts that are as capable of adaptation as ESQ+, but I am sure ESQ+ can continue to evolve and adapt to what different users need.
-
Have always fantasized about writing an Emacs-like editor. What would be a good language (apart from LISP)?
Yeah, there is not reason not to use lisp and a million reasons to use it. https://github.com/lem-project/lem
-
Lem: Anyone Here Using the Lem Text Editor?
[[email protected] ~]# cd common-lisp/ [[email protected] common-lisp]# git clone https://github.com/scymtym/esrap.git [[email protected] common-lisp]# git clone https://github.com/lem-project/lem.git [[email protected] common-lisp]# cd
- lem: Common Lisp editor/IDE with high expansibility
-
Is it a pipe dream for Emacs to be as fast as Neovim?
Check out The lem text editor too.
- Please, no electron · Issue #551 · lem-project/lem
- Lem editor v1.9.1
Stats
cxxxr/lem is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
Popular Comparisons
Are you hiring? Post a new remote job listing for free.