go-pry

An interactive REPL for Go that allows you to drop into your code at any point. (by d4l3k)

Go-pry Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to go-pry

  1. gomacro

    Interactive Go interpreter and debugger with REPL, Eval, generics and Lisp-like macros

  2. SaaSHub

    SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

    SaaSHub logo
  3. scriggo

    The world’s most powerful template engine and Go embeddable interpreter

  4. nodebook

    Nodebook - Multi-Lang Web REPL + CLI Code runner

  5. bfgo

    A fast, optimizing, BF compiler, interpreter, and REPL. Also includes a BF formatter and minifier! Implemented in Go. Batteries included.

  6. rHttp

    REPL for HTTP

  7. goawk

    22 go-pry VS goawk

    A POSIX-compliant AWK interpreter written in Go, with CSV support

  8. lgo

    0 go-pry VS lgo

    Interactive Go programming with Jupyter

  9. sh

    21 go-pry VS sh

    A shell parser, formatter, and interpreter with bash and zsh support; includes shfmt (by mvdan)

  10. yaegi

    43 go-pry VS yaegi

    Yaegi is Another Elegant Go Interpreter

  11. replbot

    Slack/Discord bot for running interactive REPLs and shells from a chat.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better go-pry alternative or higher similarity.

go-pry discussion

Log in or Post with

go-pry reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of go-pry. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

Stats

Basic go-pry repo stats
1
3,009
1.2
over 3 years ago

d4l3k/go-pry is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.

The primary programming language of go-pry is Go.


Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com

Did you know that Go is
the 4th most popular programming language
based on number of references?