Similar projects and alternatives to should
Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!
A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
Static code analysis for 29 languages.. Your projects are multi-language. So is SonarQube analysis. Find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells so you can release quality code every time. Get started analyzing your projects today for free.
Mutation testing for .NET core and .NET framework!
Smooth your .NET TDD experience with NFluent! NFluent is an ergonomic assertion library which aims to fluent your .NET TDD experience (based on simple Check.That() assertion statements). NFluent aims your tests to be fluent to write (with a super-duper-happy 'dot' auto-completion experience), fluent to read (i.e. as close as possible to plain English expression), but also fluent to troubleshoot, in a less-error-prone way comparing to the classical .NET test frameworks. NFluent is also directly i
xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
Machine.Specifications is a Context/Specification framework for .NET that removes language noise and simplifies tests.
Access the most powerful time series database as a service. Ingest, store, & analyze all types of time series data in a fully-managed, purpose-built database. Keep data forever with low-cost storage and superior data compression.
A friendly substitute for .NET mocking libraries.
What you have been waiting for :+1: Perform a deep compare of any two .NET objects using reflection. Shows the differences between the two objects.
BDD in .NET Core - using Xunit and Gherkin (compatible with both .NET Core and .NET)
BDD framework for xUnit.net
Small BDD Framework built on top of xUnit
Specification testing for xunit
MSTest framework and adapter (by microsoft)
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
should reviews and mentions
NUnit vs XUnit for .net6+ microservices
7 projects | reddit.com/r/dotnet | 1 Mar 2023
On a side note, something I would highly recommend NOT doing is using the built in assertion types for any of the test adapters. Without a doubt the hardest part of switching unit test frameworks is having to fix all your assertions which is why we use 3rd party assertions. The built-in assertions also tend to not be very feature rich and don't have the most helpful messages. We personally use FluentAssertions, but there are other options such as Shoudly or Should. I highly recommend picking one of them over the built in assertions. You will thank yourself later :)
erichexter/Should is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.