SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Aoc2018 Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to aoc2018
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
InfluxDB
InfluxDB high-performance time series database. Collect, organize, and act on massive volumes of high-resolution data to power real-time intelligent systems.
-
-
-
advent-of-code
My Advent of Code submissions. For 2021 and before, these are the original code I used, without any modifications after-the-fact. As such, they are probably not as efficient or short as they should be, because I want a working solution faster, not a better solution. For 2022 and after, these are the solutions uploaded to my YouTube channel.
aoc2018 discussion
aoc2018 reviews and mentions
-
Working on integers consume more memory?
Here's an example where switching to int8/int16 sped up my program 3x, but insignificantly compared to development and compile times, namely from 15 to 5 ms. I haven't profiled it but I suspect it's because of the reduced memmove amounts in my improvised bsearch-sorted-array-insertion. Made this yesterday, solution to Advent of Code 2018 day 20: https://github.com/ednl/aoc2018/blob/main/20.c
-
[All years, all days][C#.NET] Joined the 400 stars club!
I made this jupyter notebook for a better idea and to directly compare different grid serial numbers. I think the condition "stop when no new max has been found twice in a row" will work most of the time. I tested a few other serial numbers and it seemed OK: the condition is only true directly AFTER the absolute maximum. But yes, there could well be other serial numbers where there is a dip of length 2 BEFORE the absolute maximum. Screenshot of the graph from the notebook: https://i.imgur.com/VXXpZnh.png
-
Advent of Code (AoC) Day One
This is the seventh year puzzles, if you want to check out previous years take a look at: 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020
-
[2018 day 9] [C] Fast solution to the marble game
Well, I think I mostly got it. But what I couldn't figure out was which updates to skip, so maybe it can get a bit faster still. Time on the M1 Mac Mini was 4.3 ms for combined user+system, see below. That system time being as long as the user time is maybe from the massive heap allocation and init to zero at program start? I also tried to do it dynamically with malloc, without block initialisation, but that was a tiny bit slower, so I left it as a static array. Pi 400: 98 ms, old Macbook from 2013: 36 ms (both same deal: user time = system time). Code: https://github.com/ednl/aoc2018/blob/main/day09alt.c
-
[2018 Day 16 (Part 2)] Interpretation of 2018, day 16, part 2
This is my solution in C which runs in under 2 ms: https://github.com/ednl/aoc2018/blob/main/day16.c
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 25 Apr 2025
Stats
ednl/aoc2018 is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of aoc2018 is Jupyter Notebook.