C-fancy-string Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to c-fancy-string based on common topics and language

CWebStudio

19 21 9.3 C c-fancy-string VS CWebStudio

An Modern Reactive C Web Server
Universal-Garbage-Colector

2 5 9.1 C c-fancy-string VS Universal-Garbage-Colector

An Small lib for an universal garbage colector in C
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
CHashManipulator

2 2 9.6 C c-fancy-string VS CHashManipulator
Articles

1 6 6.5 C c-fancy-string VS Articles

Articles about coding styles and Companys Opinion (by OUIsolutions)
toaruos

22 4,690 9.8 C c-fancy-string VS toaruos

Discontinued A completely-from-scratch hobby operating system: bootloader, kernel, drivers, C library, and userspace including a composited graphical UI, dynamic linker, syntax-highlighting text editor, network stack, etc.
libwebsockets

12 4,581 8.5 C c-fancy-string VS libwebsockets

canonical libwebsockets.org networking library
moonlight-common-c

1 398 8.9 C c-fancy-string VS moonlight-common-c

Core implementation of Nvidia's GameStream protocol (by moonlight-stream)
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better c-fancy-string alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to c-fancy-string

c-fancy-string reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of c-fancy-string. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-10.

The Post Modern C Style
7 projects | /r/C_Programming | 10 Dec 2023

Funny enough, I recently (just last week) published a project using a style very similar to what you are describing in your article. The project is called lib: A C library for easy and fun string manipulation. I my case, however, the structure's definition is done in the implementation file, in order to create an abstract type whose members are private (at least, they try to be private; it's always possible to get them).
Is string splitting supposed to be this painful?
1 project | /r/cprogramming | 8 Dec 2023

I can totally relate with this post. I was faced with a similar situation a few weeks ago while experimenting with a C library for a particular network protocol and started struggling while trying to implement basic string operations. I ended up taking a tangent and writing a simple string manipulation library with an API similar to JavaScript's String API. I am sharing it here in case anyone is interested. I called it lib. Be warned though: performance was not at the top of my list of design goals for this project. In other words, there is a lot of copying of things around happening, which comes at a cost. But I think it's going to be a fun library to work with for projects where performance is not a deciding factor (e.g., script-style programs).