Bgems Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to bgems

webpack

331 64,178 9.8 JavaScript bgems VS webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows for loading parts of the application on demand. Through "loaders", modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
buildkit

53 7,686 9.8 Go bgems VS buildkit

concurrent, cache-efficient, and Dockerfile-agnostic builder toolkit
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com featured

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
awesome-compose

45 30,351 2.6 HTML bgems VS awesome-compose

Awesome Docker Compose samples
dockerfiles

34 13,498 0.0 Dockerfile bgems VS dockerfiles

Various Dockerfiles I use on the desktop and on servers.
docker-rails-example

32 914 7.8 Ruby bgems VS docker-rails-example

A production ready example Rails app that's using Docker and Docker Compose.
buildah

25 7,019 9.6 Go bgems VS buildah

A tool that facilitates building OCI images.
mrsk

26 6,294 9.4 TeX bgems VS mrsk

Discontinued Deploy web apps anywhere. [Moved to: https://github.com/basecamp/kamal]
SaaSHub

www.saashub.com featured

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
skopeo

22 7,402 9.0 Go bgems VS skopeo

Work with remote images registries - retrieving information, images, signing content
lamby

11 581 5.9 Ruby bgems VS lamby

🐑🛤 Simple Rails & AWS Lambda Integration
cruftspy

3 15 0.0 Python bgems VS cruftspy

Detect unnecessary files in Docker images
docker-projects

1 - - bgems VS docker-projects
dockerfile-rails

5 438 8.9 Dockerfile bgems VS dockerfile-rails

Provides a Rails generator to produce Dockerfiles and related files.
dinker

2 12 10.0 Go bgems VS dinker

Dinker, dinky Docker images

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better bgems alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to bgems

bgems reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of bgems. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-26.

Rails on Docker · Fly
16 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 26 Jan 2023

One problem you're likely to run into is that systems using the same packaging lineage cut the same dependency up in different ways. The "right name" for a dependency can change between Ubuntu and Debian, between different releases of Ubuntu, and different architectures. It very quickly gets out of hand for any interesting set of dependencies. Now it might be that there's enough stability in the repositories these days that that's less true than it was, but I remember running into some really annoying cases at one point when I had a full gem mirror to play with.
This is one of those problems that sounds easy but gets really fiddly. I had a quick run at it from a slightly different direction a looooong time ago: binary gems (https://github.com/regularfry/bgems although heaven knows if it even still runs). Precompiled binary gems would dramatically speed up installation at the cost of a) storage; and b) getting it right once. The script I cobbled together gathers the dependencies together into a `.Depends` file which you can just pipe through to the package manager, and could happily use to strap together a package corresponding to the dependency list.
I've never really understood why a standard for precompiled gems never emerged, but it turns out it's drop-dead simple to implement. The script does some linker magic to reverse engineer the dpkg package dependency list from a compiled binary. I was quite pleased with it at the time, and while I don't think it's bullet-proof I do think it's worth having a poke at for ideas. Of course it can only detect binary dependencies, not data dependencies or anything more interesting, so there's still room for improvement.