Semantic-pull-requests Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to semantic-pull-requests

• ESLint

  381 24,310 9.7 JavaScript semantic-pull-requests VS ESLint

  Find and fix problems in your JavaScript code.

  

• pyroscope

  56 7,382 9.6 Go semantic-pull-requests VS pyroscope

  Discontinued Continuous Profiling Platform. Debug performance issues down to a single line of code [Moved to: https://github.com/grafana/pyroscope] (by pyroscope-io)

  

• InfluxDB

  www.influxdata.com featured

  Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

  

• grype

  56 7,678 9.5 Go semantic-pull-requests VS grype

  A vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems

  

• release-please

  47 4,227 8.5 TypeScript semantic-pull-requests VS release-please

  generate release PRs based on the conventionalcommits.org spec

  

• syft

  32 5,477 9.8 Go semantic-pull-requests VS syft

  CLI tool and library for generating a Software Bill of Materials from container images and filesystems

  

• conventional-changelog

  12 7,574 9.0 TypeScript semantic-pull-requests VS conventional-changelog

  Generate changelogs and release notes from a project's commit messages and metadata.

  

• chronicle

  2 42 8.5 Go semantic-pull-requests VS chronicle

  a fast changelog generator sourced from PRs and Issues (by anchore)

  

• SaaSHub

  www.saashub.com featured

  SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

  

• conventional-chang

  1 - - semantic-pull-requests VS conventional-chang

• bmlt-root-server

  2 13 6.5 PHP semantic-pull-requests VS bmlt-root-server

  This is the Main Root Server Repo for the Basic Meeting List Toolbox

  

• traject

  1 99 4.2 Ruby semantic-pull-requests VS traject

  An easy to use, high-performance, flexible and extensible metadata transformation system, focused on library-archives-museums input, and indexing to Solr as output.