Thun Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to Thun based on common topics and language

collapseos

96 4,405 0.0 C Thun VS collapseos

Discontinued Bootstrap post-collapse technology
factor

59 1,585 9.8 Factor Thun VS factor

Factor programming language
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com featured

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
learn-to-cloud

7 4,411 7.6 JavaScript Thun VS learn-to-cloud

Learn the fundamentals of cloud computing
DevOps-Guide

1 7,671 6.4 HTML Thun VS DevOps-Guide

DevOps Guide - Development to Production all configurations with basic notes to debug efficiently.
Joy

1 73 7.6 C Thun VS Joy

Manfred von Thun's Programming Language Joy (by Wodan58)
MicroPython

197 18,387 9.8 C Thun VS MicroPython

MicroPython - a lean and efficient Python implementation for microcontrollers and constrained systems
pyroscope

5 9,437 9.8 C Thun VS pyroscope

Continuous Profiling Platform. Debug performance issues down to a single line of code
SaaSHub

www.saashub.com featured

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better Thun alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to Thun

Thun reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of Thun. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-12.

Forth: A New Way to Program a Mini Computer (1974)
3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Oct 2022
I've been playing with a language called Joy, created by Manfred von Thun, which seems to me to combine the best parts of Forth and Lisp while being simpler and more elegant than both. I suspect it might be the simplest useful language.
"A Conversation with Manfred von Thun" in Vector, journal of the British APL Association http://archive.vector.org.uk/art10000350
https://hypercubed.github.io/joy/joy.html
Kevin Albrecht’s mirror of Manfred von Thun’s original website for the Joy Programming Language http://www.kevinalbrecht.com/code/joy-mirror/index.html
https://joypy.osdn.io/ (My own project) Here's a flowchart (SVG) for the interpreter loop: https://github.com/calroc/Thun/blob/simpler/joy_interpreter_...
It boils down to quotation as the primary operation, denoted by enclosing expressions in square brackets. Various combinators accept quotes on the stack and prepend (or not) one or more of them to the pending expression under evaluation (like Continuation-Passing Style), and that's it. That's the whole evaluation model.
E.g. "branch" combinator accepts a Boolean value and two quoted expressions and put one of them onto the pending expression based on the Boolean value:
```
    bool [ELSE] [THEN] branch
```