Does removing attribution constitute a GPLv3 violation?

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on news.ycombinator.com

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
  • 2fa-qr

    :iphone: JavaScript 2FA QR code generator.

  • >> Besides being bad behavior, is this violating the license?

    Yes. Removing attribution violates the license.

    https://github.com/stefansundin/2fa-qr/blob/gh-pages/LICENSE states:

    "Permissions of this strong copyleft license are conditioned on making available complete source code of licensed works and modifications, which include larger works using a licensed work, under the same license. Copyright and license notices must be preserved. Contributors provide an express grant of patent rights."

    By removing attribution, the "Copyright and license notices must be preserved." clause is being violated.

  • 2fa-qr

    Discontinued :iphone: JavaScript 2FA QR code generator. (by Fordeer)

  • This has happened to me a number of times. People fork a GitHub project of mine only to remove the attribution where my name appears. I find it to be rude.

    Example: https://github.com/Fordeer/2fa-qr/commit/c2c5321ddb6b5f00246f52fef1cb6977c39c7352

  • WorkOS

    The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.

    WorkOS logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts