Guido van Rossum: Faster CPython (2021) [pdf]

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on

Our great sponsors
  • Scout APM - Less time debugging, more time building
  • SonarQube - Static code analysis for 29 languages.
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
  • Pyston

    A faster and highly-compatible implementation of the Python programming language.

    Honestly, even that seems trivial? By my reading of , the only impact is that when you install (compiled) libraries they need to be recompiled, just like if you use Alpine (which is also ABI-incompatible because it uses musl libc), which is a little bit of pain at build/packaging time but doesn't actually break anything (i.e. there are no libraries that you can't use, just libraries with an extra compile step) and doesn't affect runtime behavior at all.

  • ideas

  • Scout APM

    Less time debugging, more time building. Scout APM allows you to find and fix performance issues with no hassle. Now with error monitoring and external services monitoring, Scout is a developer's best friend when it comes to application development.

  • jax-md

    Differentiable, Hardware Accelerated, Molecular Dynamics

  • Buffalo

    Rapid Web Development w/ Go

    Every month or so I look around to see if there's a monolithic web framework in languages I'm interested that are effectively equivalents of Django, Rails, Laravel, etc. I've done a lot of non-webapp stuff with Go, for example, and would like to build full fledged webapps with a Django-like framework in Go. But nothing like that truly exists. I've found projects like Buffalo [0] that promise this monolithic experience, but they're still very much works in progress. Even Node lacks such a true monolithic web framework from what I can tell.


  • faster-cpython

    How to make CPython faster.

    But a JIT is already planned for a future release it’s just there’s a ton of other improvements they can do to speed it up first. See: where the plan is detailed.

  • FrameworkBenchmarks

    Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project

    Choosing a language is a significant factor towards the performance of your services.

    A service built in go can req/resp up to 30x faster than one built in python.

    I know benchmarking isn't always the greatest, especially when the previous maintainer of Actix-Web (Rust) kind of cheated to get to the top of the leaderboard, but it still provides a decent general overview of how many responses/s a service can handle when using the same box.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts