Is interactive REPL-based development in conflict with the functional discipline?

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on /r/lisp

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
  • nrepl

    A Clojure network REPL that provides a server and client, along with some common APIs of use to IDEs and other tools that may need to evaluate Clojure code in remote environments.

  • No and no. Scheme is loosely biased toward FP and still you still have a REPL with Scheme dialects, including Racket going as far as to provide an IDE+REPL combination (DrRacket). Clojure is strongly opinionated toward FP and also has a strong REPL experience and a good experience for interactive, iterative development on running programs via nrepl. OCaml, another functional language from the ML family, has one of the best non-lispi REPLs (called a "toplevel" there) around. And, of course, you can do FP in CL as well despite it not really encouraging it in the same way.

  • InfluxDB

    Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

    InfluxDB logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts