-
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
-
I don't really like 'Component'. I seems very clunky and we had a lot of issues with it and a lot incidental complexity in our codebase (now converted to Java). It was the first real system that did these sort of things but if I start a project now, I much rather use Integrant or Clip.
https://github.com/weavejester/integrant
https://github.com/juxt/clip
I haven't used Clip a lot yet but my next project is defiantly going to be with Clip.
I don't really like 'Component'. I seems very clunky and we had a lot of issues with it and a lot incidental complexity in our codebase (now converted to Java). It was the first real system that did these sort of things but if I start a project now, I much rather use Integrant or Clip.
https://github.com/weavejester/integrant
https://github.com/juxt/clip
I haven't used Clip a lot yet but my next project is defiantly going to be with Clip.
Seeing that there is a need for type checking in Clojure. Has anyone used https://github.com/typedclojure/typedclojure in production?
No, I don't think they were hyped at any point.
They are used in certain libraries like https://github.com/ptaoussanis/timbre but for things that are simply not possible without macros, for example (timbre/spy (+ 1 1)) will actually print both the expression and the result:
DEBUG [ss.experimental.scratch:1] - (+ 1 1) => 2
Perhaps if the macros are "simple" they can be unpacked relatively easily. I do understand how mentally challenging that can be for somebody who's just starting with Clojure. I've been using Clojure for ~8 years and only just recently became more comfortable with macros after I made a conscious effort in that direction. I'm still far from an "expert" in them.