In OpenZFS and Btrfs, everyone was just guessing

1. zfs

   1 752 10,954 9.8 C

   OpenZFS on Linux and FreeBSD

   

   > it seems like this bug might actually date back to the very beginning of ZFS with Sun

   Looks like you might be right about that. The oldest commit referenced in the fix [0] was from 2006[1], which was just months after Sun released ZFS.

   [0] https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15571

   [1] https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/c543ec060d

2. CodeRabbit

   coderabbit.ai featured

   CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

   

3. zfs

   2 1 1 10.0 C

   Native ZFS for Linux (by rohan-puri)

4. openzfs-docs

   3 10 141 7.3 Python

   OpenZFS Documentation

   

   I'm a little sad to see this. I've been using ZFS on my PCs for years with minimal issue and significant benefits. [1] I've even contributed [2]. And I remain a huge fan.

   I don't believe that "everyone is just guessing". There are some pretty knowledgeable folk that work on this.

   [1] I've triggered some corruption in snapshots on an encrypted pool. No permanent problems resulted and no data was lost.

   [2] I provided a very minor documentation fix that was encouraged and promptly merged. https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs-docs/pull/472

5. illumos-gate

   4 36 1,693 9.6 C

   An open-source Unix operating system

   

   > it seems like this bug might actually date back to the very beginning of ZFS with Sun

   Looks like you might be right about that. The oldest commit referenced in the fix [0] was from 2006[1], which was just months after Sun released ZFS.

   [0] https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15571

   [1] https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/c543ec060d

Suggest a related project