-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
I understand that Firefox is on average faster than Chrome at WASM, though there are plenty of tests where either is faster than the other.
However, I can’t find much actual qualitative performance comparison of Firefox (there’s a little more of V8).
A couple that I have found are https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/jangda (from almost two years ago), showing Firefox being about 20% faster than Chrome:
> Across the SPEC CPU suite of benchmarks, we find a substantial performance gap: applications compiled to WebAssembly run slower by an average of 45% (Firefox) to 55% (Chrome), with peak slowdowns of 2.08× (Firefox) and 2.5× (Chrome).
And https://github.com/wasm3/wasm3/blob/master/docs/Performance.... of CoreMark 1.0 (higher is better), showing Firefox being about 5% faster than Chromium:
Webassembly.sh (Chromium 78) 6914.325225 4.2x
This is not less portable and will beat any wasm interpreter in terms of speed: https://github.com/wwwg/wasmdec
Related posts
-
Help Optimizing a VM
-
Wasm3 release v0.5.0: Multi-Values, Bulk Memory ops, Apple M1 support
-
Wasm3: The fastest WebAssembly interpreter, and the most universal runtime
-
Wasm3 v0.4.9: seamless WebAssembly/WASI tracing, Python integration, etc.
-
Wasm3 engine v0.4.9 – tracing of WASM/WASI execution flow, new API, Python 3 in