SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Zig command-line-arguments-parser Projects
-
Zig and Rust both promote explicit error handling, however their mechanisms are different. Rust uses Result enums, while Zig uses a (global) error set type (though similar to an enum) and error propagation. Similarly, Rust uses the Option enum for optional types, while Zig uses a type modifier (?T). Both offer modern, syntactic sugar to handle those (call()? and if let Some(value) = optional {} in Rust, try call() and if (optional) |value| {} in Zig). Since Rust uses the standard library to implement error handling and options, users have the possibility to extend those systems which is quite powerful. However, I like the approach Zig takes in providing those things as language features. While their approach fits well into the C universe, I dislike that there is no pragmatic way to add more context to an error (but well, no allocations). Libraries like [clap](https://github.com/Hejsil/zig-clap) solve this by implementing a diagnostics mechanism.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
Zig command-line-arguments-parser discussion
Zig command-line-arguments-parser related posts
-
After a day of programming in Zig
-
Is it too early to use Zig for CLI tooling ideas?
-
How to get type of active field of tagged union in v0.9.0?
-
yazap v0.3.0: now supports auto help text generation
-
Announcing yazap v0.2.0 release!
-
Announcing yazap (previously zig-arg) v0.1.0: A new command line argument parser library
-
Docco for printing, getting input, cmdline args?
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 7 Dec 2024