zsh-bench
zoxide
zsh-bench | zoxide | |
---|---|---|
24 | 100 | |
494 | 18,590 | |
- | - | |
4.1 | 8.2 | |
6 months ago | 7 days ago | |
Shell | Rust | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
zsh-bench
-
Oh My Zsh
Someone's made a benchmarking system for zsh: https://github.com/romkatv/zsh-bench#premade-configs
Of course, their config is the best according to the benchmark (and ohmyzsh is the slowest option), but DIY configs are also covered, particularly possible performance optimizations.
-
Faster Shell Startup with Shell Switching
Unfortunately, running exit is not a great strategy for running benchmarks. For zsh specifically, plugin managers are optimized for fast exit.
romkatv did a great write-up and benchmark within the context of zsh[0]. It's a great read.
[0] https://github.com/romkatv/zsh-bench#how-not-to-benchmark
- Dynamic Aliases and Functions in Zsh
- Benchmark for interactive zsh – plugins, frameworks and plugin managers
- zsh-smartcache: another evalcache but can update the cache
-
Announcing Spaceship v4.0 — a customizable Zsh prompt with asynchronous rendering
Given the addition of async rendering in the latest release of spaceship, I wasn't sure whether I should include performance in the list of features found in powerlevel10kbut but not in spaceship. I used zsh-bench to benchmark powerlevel10k on my laptop running on battery (I'm writing this on a train) with a config that makes powerlevel10k looks similar to spaceship. I simply ran p10k configure and chose what looked most similar: Lean Style, UNICODE, 256 colors, two lines, etc. Here are the benchmark results:
-
7x slowdown when modify $fpath and add completion script
Obligatory link since you are engaging in profiling interactive zsh: https://github.com/romkatv/zsh-bench.
-
What is the best plugin manager in your opinion?
1.) It's fast. Like, really fast. 1.) It supports deferred loading via zsh-defer 1.) It supports local plugins as well as ones hosted via a git provider (aka: GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket, etc) 1.) The codebase is simple and easy to understand and contribute to 1.) It supports git branches (with tag/shas on the roadmap) 1.) It supports partial plugin loading such as loading Oh-My-Zsh plugins and Prezto modules without loading the whole framework. 1.) There's an easy migration path from legacy plugin managers like Antigen/Antibody. 1.) Plugins are managed via a simple plugins file that makes it easy to share your config with others. 1.) And lots more
-
Zsh significantly faster when sourced from bash with bash as default shell
In any case, slow zsh startup is always caused by whatever you put in zsh startup files and it's always possible to reduce zsh startup to imperceptible levels without sacrificing any functionality by editing said startup files. There is a bit of info on interactive zsh performance at https://github.com/romkatv/zsh-bench.
-
Zpy is a simple zsh plugin manager written in python that don't add to the shell startup time.what to y'all think?
Why is this a good thing? Is this a proxy for performance? If so, you can measure performance directly with zsh-bench. This way you can describe the advantage in terms that have real value to end users. For example, you can say that the first prompt appears N milliseconds faster when using Zpy than if you were using something-else.
zoxide
- Say good bye to cd and hello Zoxide - the better and smarter cd command
-
You might want to replace cd command with Zoxide 🎉 — a smarter and trainable cd alternative 🗂️
Head over to ajeetdsouza/zoxide and install it now! It's innovative, free, and flexible!
- A smarter CD command. Supports all major shells
-
Z – Jump Around
I use this Rust clone which works great, no complaints: https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide
Although, I don't know what the difference is, other than the language of choice.
-
Cdpath: Easily Navigate Directories in the Terminal
I use https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide, which is inspired by z and autojump.
-
Ask HN: Share a shell script you like
Zoxide is basically the 'Rust Rewrite' version of the 'Z' tool and is actively maintained, I haven't had any issues with it: https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide
-
env::set_current_dir() -- is either not functioning as intended or I'm just messing something up
Indeed, utilities like zoxide which operate primarily as a cd replacement don't attempt to change directories via rust code - they create a shell alias that ultimately invokes a shell builtin to do it.
-
Everything I Installed on My New Mac
I also still use zoxide for navigating directories. It's a smarter cd command that learns your habits and makes navigating directories a breeze.
-
Top Productivity CLI Tools I Use on Linux
4. Zoxide
-
How to achieve the function of the Mac app Hookmark in the terminal?
Not sure what you mean by bookmarks, but I use zoxide to quickly jump to frequently used folders.
What are some alternatives?
fisher - A plugin manager for Fish
autojump - A cd command that learns - easily navigate directories from the command line
zinit - 🌻 Flexible and fast ZSH plugin manager
z - z - jump around
sheldon - :bowtie: Fast, configurable, shell plugin manager
zsh-z - Jump quickly to directories that you have visited "frecently." A native Zsh port of z.sh with added features.
powerlevel10k - A Zsh theme
fasd - Command-line productivity booster, offers quick access to files and directories, inspired by autojump, z and v.
zsh4humans - A turnkey configuration for Zsh
z.lua - :zap: A new cd command that helps you navigate faster by learning your habits.
oh-my-fish - The Fish Shell Framework
fzf - :cherry_blossom: A command-line fuzzy finder