zio-schema VS cloroutine

That largely depends on the type system. Languages like Haskell and Scala which have much more powerful type systems than C/Java/Go/etc absolutely do allow you to do those sorts of things. It is a bit harder to wrap your head around to be sure and there are some rough edges, but once you get the hang of it you can get the benefits of static typing with the flexibility of dynamic typing. See https://github.com/milessabin/shapeless or a project that I've been working on a lot lately https://github.com/zio/zio-schema.

Thanks for sharing! I think these restarts could definitely be implemented as a library in Clojure with the help of a coroutine library like https://github.com/leonoel/cloroutine#guides

Do you mean the example here https://github.com/leonoel/cloroutine/blob/master/doc/01-generators.md , with the `*tail* binding? It took me a long time looking at it to finally grok it, and it's really hard to explain in English but basically when the coroutine comes across one of these symbols that are "breaks" (in our case, "yield" is such a breaking symbol), then it will pause the coroutine, and actually call what the symbol points to (the implementation of "yield"), which returns (cons x *tail*), and keep in mind that it is all run within a recursive call to gen-seq where *tail* is bound to a lazy-seq of the remainder of the generator (binding [*tail* (gen-seq gen)] (gen)), it's pretty confusing but yeah just have to stare at it for a long time I think haha.

I think Clojure is really missing python/js-style generators, like what is implemented in https://github.com/leonoel/cloroutine/blob/master/doc/01-generators.md

The next level up is core.async go blocks which compile your AST to a state machine. Also see cloroutine which also compiles the AST to a state machine or something, one of the tutorials uses cloroutine to add async/await to Clojure.

Coroutines are a more general concept, and can be used to implement conditions/delimited continuations. There’s an example in their docs.