zig-clap VS known-folders

Zig and Rust both promote explicit error handling, however their mechanisms are different. Rust uses Result enums, while Zig uses a (global) error set type (though similar to an enum) and error propagation. Similarly, Rust uses the Option enum for optional types, while Zig uses a type modifier (?T). Both offer modern, syntactic sugar to handle those (call()? and if let Some(value) = optional {} in Rust, try call() and if (optional) |value| {} in Zig). Since Rust uses the standard library to implement error handling and options, users have the possibility to extend those systems which is quite powerful. However, I like the approach Zig takes in providing those things as language features. While their approach fits well into the C universe, I dislike that there is no pragmatic way to add more context to an error (but well, no allocations). Libraries like [clap](https://github.com/Hejsil/zig-clap) solve this by implementing a diagnostics mechanism.

It's somewhat early, but there are libraries like https://github.com/Hejsil/zig-clap that can make writing CLIs a bit easier.

Command line args: std.process or the zig-clap library

zig-overlay.url = "github:mitchellh/zig-overlay"; zig-overlay.inputs.nixpkgs.follows = "nixpkgs"; gitignore.url = "github:hercules-ci/gitignore.nix"; gitignore.inputs.nixpkgs.follows = "nixpkgs"; flake-utils.url = "github:numtide/flake-utils"; known-folders.url = "https://github.com/ziglibs/known-folders/archive/53fe3b676f32e59d46f4fd201d7ab200e5f6cb98.tar.gz"; known-folders.flake = false; tres.url = "https://github.com/ziglibs/tres/archive/d8b0c24a945da02fffdae731edd1903c6889e73c.tar.gz"; tres.flake = false; diffz.url = "https://github.com/ziglibs/diffz/archive/efc91679b000a2d7f86fb40930f0a95a0d349bff.tar.gz"; diffz.flake = false;