foundry
A model factory library for creating expressive, auto-completable, on-demand dev/test fixtures with Symfony and Doctrine. (by zenstruck)
Infection
PHP Mutation Testing library (by infection)
| foundry | Infection | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 636 | 2,034 | |
| 1.3% | 0.8% | |
| 8.9 | 8.7 | |
| 4 days ago | 9 days ago | |
| PHP | PHP | |
| MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
foundry
Posts with mentions or reviews of foundry.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-29.
-
Which framework for a beginnner?
all the hate on laravel... 1. laravel is easier to setup 2. certainly easier to use. Way easier. Just to name a few: PAGINATOR. API Resource. Wayyyy easier in laravel. 3. Many ideas of laravel were actually copied to symfony, look at https://github.com/zenstruck/foundry it even mentions it. Because it were such KILLER ideas.
Infection
Posts with mentions or reviews of Infection.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-18.
-
PHP: testing, "Attention please!"
consider adding mutation tests
-
Who tests the tests? Mutation testing with Infection in PHP
Obviously, we can not generate mutants manually. For that purpose, there are mutation testing utilities. For PHP, we have Infection.
-
PHP libraries and tools
Infection: PHP Mutation Testing library. Plugins: roave/infection-static-analysis-plugin: Static analysis on top of mutation testing - prevents escaped mutants from being invalid according to static analysis bitexpert/captainhook-infection: Captain Hook Plugin to run InfectionPHP only against the changed files of a commit
Infection: PHP Mutation Testing library. Plugins: roave/infection-static-analysis-plugin: Static analysis on top of mutation testing - prevents escaped mutants from being invalid according to static analysis bitexpert/captainhook-infection: Captain Hook Plugin to run InfectionPHP only against the changed files of a commit
-
I created a package to encourage developers in my team to write tests. What do you think? Any feedback? Thanks!
If you want to enforce testing automatically probably the best option is to rely on mutation testing, using Infection. That doesn't just check that the tests cover the code, it checks that if the code was different to what it is then the tests would (usually) fail.
-
Collecting line, branch, and path coverage with PHPUnit
IMO code coverage is a very flawed metric on its own. A high percentage doesn't guarantee that the tests actually test the right things, and it would be much more efficient if mutation testing was used (e.g. Infection). It still uses the generated code coverage reports, but only as a base for its own metrics.
-
Am I writing the right kinds of (unit) tests? See below for an example. Thanks!
For your last edit - you can also add infection which will infect your code with other values, like if you expect a positive number, it will try and inject a negative number - and see what happens - does your code break everything or something. Also it will try to inject false where you might expect a true and many many other things, and yes you will get some weird results from infection, but its a good thing to look at, and atleast check the logs and see why the infection failed at a test.
- I'm looking for "complex" or "advanced" topics that don't get enough coverage
-
Codewars Kata. It uses 100 random tests for a boolean.
The only one that I've used is infection for PHP.
-
Verify your true code coverage by removing lines of PHP code, see if it affects PHPUnit results
That's practically a light form of mutant testing. Have you checked Infection?
What are some alternatives?
When comparing foundry and Infection you can also consider the following projects:
php-mysql-engine - A MySQL engine written in pure PHP
Pest - Pest is an elegant PHP testing Framework with a focus on simplicity, meticulously designed to bring back the joy of testing in PHP.
rector-laravel - Rector upgrades rules for Laravel
faker-images - Different images provider for Faker
psalm-plugin-symfony - Psalm Plugin for Symfony
psalm-plugin-phpunit - A PHPUnit plugin for Psalm
Phalcon - High performance, full-stack PHP framework delivered as a C extension.
churn-php - Discover files in need of refactoring.
CodeIgniter - Open Source PHP Framework (originally from EllisLab)
rector-symfony - Rector upgrade rules for Symfony
foundry vs php-mysql-engine
Infection vs Pest
foundry vs Pest
Infection vs rector-laravel
foundry vs faker-images
Infection vs php-mysql-engine
foundry vs psalm-plugin-symfony
Infection vs psalm-plugin-phpunit
foundry vs Phalcon
Infection vs churn-php
foundry vs CodeIgniter
Infection vs rector-symfony