Our great sponsors
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
IMO code coverage is a very flawed metric on its own. A high percentage doesn't guarantee that the tests actually test the right things, and it would be much more efficient if mutation testing was used (e.g. Infection). It still uses the generated code coverage reports, but only as a base for its own metrics.
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.
Related posts
- Who tests the tests? Mutation testing with Infection in PHP
- I created a package to encourage developers in my team to write tests. What do you think? Any feedback? Thanks!
- I'm looking for "complex" or "advanced" topics that don't get enough coverage
- Codewars Kata. It uses 100 random tests for a boolean.
- Verify your true code coverage by removing lines of PHP code, see if it affects PHPUnit results