yeoman VS Visual Studio Code

Tools like yeoman, degit, and cargo generate kept me happy for years. They add basic templating capabilities to the standard git clone but they stop there. You’ll be hard pressed to find tools that go beyond setting up a directory structure.

Yeoman

I don't follow. What you're describing sounds like something akin to either Yeoman or UltiSnips and output-only tools like that don't need to care about whether two pieces of code are semantically equivalent.

Getting back to Wasm and the yo-wasm repo. This repo exists to help you easily create Wasm modules which can be published to OCI registries. The yo-wasm project currently supports publishing to either Azure Container Registry or Hippo and uses Yeoman to generate projects based on templates that are defined in this repo. There are templates for Assembly Script, C, Rust, Swift, and TinyGo. We've added a new template for C#, so let's give it a try.

This happened recently when writing a Yeoman generator to quickly scaffold new projects. I wanted to write something like expect(result).toHaveDevDependency("typescript") to assert that the package.json file generated with the project includes a specified package in its devDependencies.

You can find a few good generators for Yeoman https://yeoman.io/

Yeoman

Hi! Good project you have here! What is your main focus fot it? Being some kind of uber-generator like http://yeoman.io/ or becoming a hosting platform? Case the latter, is on-premise PaaS in the roadmap?

There are a lot of generators/scaffolding tools that can generate a base for you, whether that is the actual structure you want or not can vary a lot, but many of them have quite sensible defaults. It's often a architectural decision how you actually want to structure your code, and isn't really a one side fits all thing. One generator i have used and a lot of the templates there have pretty close to production quality setup (obviously you could always argue about personal preferences and what serves the project in question) is https://yeoman.io/ . It's web focused, but paradigms vary so much between different kinds of development it's pretty impossible to create something that could serve all of them.

VS Code https://code.visualstudio.com/ maybe

Any IDE. I recommend Visual Studio Code

If there's specific things you find lacking, please make sure to open issue(s) about it!

To write code in C++ you probably want a compiler, linker, debugger, test framework, IDE and that visualizer thing you are asking about. Since oracle bought java they seem to want to include everything, enterprise they call it. VS code is a very popular minimalist IDE, the one thing Microsoft did right in my opinion. It can add extensions from the open source community but configuration can be a pain.

Visual Studio Code code.visualstudio.com. It's a great code editor for making websites.

However, I've seen recommendations to use VS Code (https://code.visualstudio.com/) as your IDE instead of NetBeans or IntelliJ. You may not need to worry about OneDrive if you go this route. Here's the TMC extension for VS Code: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=moocfi.test-my-code

Code Editor I will be using VS Code as my preferred editor but you can use any code editor of your choice. Download Link

I recommend getting yourself an ESP32 devkit (either ESP32-DevKitC or ESP32-S3-DevKitC-1 variants), grab https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf SDK, and trying out both WiFi and BSD Sockets usage examples using VSCode + Espressif IDF or PlatformIO plugin. Hopefully you already have an existing WiFi network at home to use it with. Avoid Arduino, MicroPython, and such dumbed-down framework anything and stick with just using ESP-IDF provided APIs directly.

A code editor (e.g. Visual Studio code)

In their report they show the 10 projects with the biggest number of contributors. The first one is microsoft/vscode with 19.8K contributors in 2022 and the 10th place is tensorflow/tensorflow with 4.4K contributors. That's really nice, but my guess is that most repositories have very few contributors.