xsum VS go-benchmarks

Compare xsum vs go-benchmarks and see what are their differences.

xsum

Checksums with Merkle trees and concurrency (by sclevine)
Go Sha256 Golang Hash Md5 merkle-tree merkle Merkletree Checksum checksums Archiving data-archiving Asn1 asn1-der Pcm Audio Hashing
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

go-benchmarks

Comprehensive and reproducible benchmarks for Go developers and architects. (by skerkour)
Benchmark Benchmarking Benchmarks Go Golang Hash Hashing Cdc chunking
Source Code
kerkour.com
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
xsum go-benchmarks
1 1
9 9
- -
0.0 1.9
about 2 years ago 3 months ago
Go Go
Apache License 2.0 -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

xsum

Posts with mentions or reviews of xsum. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

go-benchmarks

Posts with mentions or reviews of go-benchmarks. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-13.
  • Reasons to Prefer Blake3 over Sha256
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 13 Nov 2023
    At the end of the day, what matters really for most people is

    1) Certifications (FIPS...)

    2) Speed.

    SHA-256 is fast enough for maybe 99,9% of use cases as you will saturate your I/O way before SHA-256 becomes your bottleneck[0][1]. Also, from my experience with the different available implementations, SHA-256 is up to 1.8 times faster than Blake3 on arm64.

    [0] https://github.com/skerkour/go-benchmarks/blob/main/results/...

    [1] https://kerkour.com/fast-hashing-algorithms

What are some alternatives?

When comparing xsum and go-benchmarks you can also consider the following projects:

image-stego - 🏞 Steganography-based image integrity - Merkle tree nodes embedded into image chunks so that each chunk's integrity can be verified on its own.

BLAKE3 - the official Rust and C implementations of the BLAKE3 cryptographic hash function

coubdl - command line tool that downloads your liked coubs for archival purposes

multihash - Self describing hashes - for future proofing

hashit - A cross platform tool to compute hashes of files quickly. Similar to hashdeep.

bao - an implementation of BLAKE3 verified streaming

ghrel - Download and verify GitHub release

BLAKE3-specs - The BLAKE3 paper: specifications, analysis, and design rationale

go-merkletree - Go Merkle Tree. High performance, Supporting parallel run, OpenZeppelin sorting pairs.

deepmark - Deepmark AI enables a unique testing environment for language models (LLM) assessment on task-specific metrics and on your own data so your GenAI-powered solution has predictable and reliable performance.

XCrack - A hash cracking tool with some other offline password attack tools

fpmoney - 🧧 Fixed-Point Decimal Money

xsum vs image-stego go-benchmarks vs BLAKE3 xsum vs coubdl go-benchmarks vs multihash xsum vs hashit go-benchmarks vs bao xsum vs ghrel go-benchmarks vs BLAKE3-specs xsum vs go-merkletree go-benchmarks vs deepmark xsum vs XCrack go-benchmarks vs fpmoney