xcaddy VS acme-companion

Compare xcaddy vs acme-companion and see what are their differences.

xcaddy

Build Caddy with plugins (by caddyserver)

acme-companion

Automated ACME SSL certificate generation for nginx-proxy (by nginx-proxy)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
xcaddy acme-companion
3 32
786 7,267
3.7% 0.5%
6.5 7.4
3 days ago about 1 month ago
Go Shell
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

xcaddy

Posts with mentions or reviews of xcaddy. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-25.
  • A Blazingly Fast Open-Source Federation V1/V2 Gateway
    7 projects | dev.to | 25 Oct 2023
    This approach offers a level of customizability similar to what xcaddy does for the Caddy server, eliminating the complexities associated with writing Rhai scripts to customize a precompiled binary, as is the case with the Apollo Router.
  • NGINX Proxy Manager
    15 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 20 May 2022
    I appreciate the reply. I took some time to look at your example so I can give some feedback on where I end up when I think about building / maintaining my own image.

    My immediate reaction is that the example is nice as a one-off build, but it's much more complex if I need to set up something I can maintain long term. I might be overthinking it, but in the context of thinking about something I can maintain my thought process is below. The questions are mostly rhetorical.

    First, what versions am I getting? Does using `2.5.1-builder` result in a customer built binary that's version `2.5.1`? The command usage [1] of the `xcaddy` command says it falls back to the `CADDY_VERSION` environment variable if it's not set explicitly. Since it's not set explicitly, I go looking for that variable in the Dockerfile [2].

    That's some templating language I'm not familiar with and I can't track down where the variable gets set, at least not quickly. I'd probably have to spend an hour learning how those templates work to figure it out. To make a quicker, educated guess, it most likely matches the builder version. The docs said the version can be set to any git ref, so I can explicitly set it to v2.5.1 on the command line [3] to be certain.

    Now, what version of `caddy-dns/cloudflare` am I getting? The xcaddy custom builds section of the docs [4] says the version can optionally be specified, but it's not specified in the above example. There aren't any tags in the repo, so it's probably building off `master`. The doc says it functions similar to `go get`, but doesn't explain what the differences are and the default behavior isn't explained either.

    The docs for `go get` [6] say it can use a revision, so maybe a specific commit can be used for that, but I'd need to test it since I'm not super familiar with Golang.

    What other risks come along with building and maintaining my own custom image? I could end up with a subtly broken build that only occurs in my environment. Portability doesn't guarantee compatibility [7] and building custom images increases the risk of compatibility issues beyond what I get with official images (building and running vs just running). That blog post is a really cool read on it's own BTW.

    I need to consider the potential for breakage even if it's miniscule because my Docker infrastructure is self hosted and will be sitting behind my custom built Caddy image. If my custom image breaks, I need a guaranteed way of having access to a previous, known good version. This is as simple as publishing the images externally, but adds an extra step since I'll need an account at a registry and need to integrate pushes to that registry into my build.

    If I build a custom image, do I let other people I help with the odd tech thing use it or is all the effort for me only? I don't want to become the maintainer of a Docker image others rely on, so I can't even re-use any related config if I help others in the future since they won't have access to the needed image.

    To be fair, I also see things I don't like in the NGINX Proxy Manager Dockerfile [7]. The two that immediately jump out at me are things I consider common mistakes. Both require unlucky timing to fail, but can technically cause failure IMO. The first is using `apt-get update` which will exit 0 on failure and has the potential to leave `apt-get install` running against obsolete versions. The second is using `apt-get update` in multiple parts of a multistage build. If I were doing it I'd run `apt-get update` in a base image and avoid it in the builder + runtime images to guarantee the versions stay the same between the build container and the runtime container.

    It took me about 1h to work through that and write this comment, so it's not just a matter of building a Docker image and plugging in the config. There's a lot of nuance that goes into maintaining a Docker image (I'm sure you know that already) and not having an image with the DNS plugin(s) baked in is a show stopper for anyone like me that can't justify maintaining their own.

    Also, a 4 line Docker file looks nice in terms of being simple, but explicitly declaring or even adding comments describing some of the things I pointed out above can save people a lot of time. Even comments with links to the relevant portions of the docs would be super useful.

    My reason for wanting the Cloudflare DNS plugin is that I have some things I want to run 100% locally without ever exposing them to the internet. The desire for wildcard certificates is to keep things from being discoverable via CTLogs.

    I hope that's useful feedback. I realize someone bemoaning the difficulty of running your stuff at home lab / small business scale isn't exactly the target audience in terms of picking up customers that pay the bills. Thanks again for the reply / example.

    1. https://github.com/caddyserver/xcaddy#command-usage

    2. https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy-docker/blob/master/Dock...

    3. https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/tree/v2.5.1

    4. https://github.com/caddyserver/xcaddy#custom-builds

    5. https://github.com/caddy-dns/cloudflare/tags

    6. https://go.dev/ref/mod#go-get

    7. https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/containers-understanding-diff...

    8. https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/docker-nginx-full/blob/...

  • bouncer for caddy / crowdsec
    3 projects | /r/CrowdSec | 23 Dec 2021
    Another option is to create the build yourself. In the repository an example of such a custom Caddy build is available in https://github.com/hslatman/caddy-crowdsec-bouncer/blob/main/cmd/main.go. You'll need Golang to be installed to be able to create a build this way. You can also use the xcaddy tool to build custom Caddy builds.

acme-companion

Posts with mentions or reviews of acme-companion. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-10.
  • Wireguard (docker-compose) has stopped being able to connect to the internet.
    2 projects | /r/WireGuard | 10 Jul 2023
    My hunch is that because I decided to include the acme-companion image in this nginx setup, that maybe it has something to do with the SSL certs? The only other thing I could think of is that I had to combine the networks in order for nginx-proxy and Sonarr both to be able to see my transmission instance via:
  • Add https to docker app
    2 projects | /r/docker | 24 Jun 2023
    Probably want acme with nginx https://github.com/nginx-proxy/acme-companion
  • Beginner questions about deploying node.js app on Beanstalk
    2 projects | /r/aws | 19 May 2023
    setting up letsencrypt with nginx-proxy and acme-companion
  • Further investigating 403 – access forbidden by rule
    2 projects | /r/nginx | 20 Mar 2023
    I'm experiencing a weird situation, and am not sure how to go about finding a solution. I am running the nginx-proxy container (https://github.com/nginx-proxy/nginx-proxy) together with the acme-companion container (https://github.com/nginx-proxy/acme-companion) to provide https connections to all my different applications under different subdomains on the same host (currently, for testing purposes: only two other nginx containers with a plain html page).
  • What is the correct way to have my webapp in one container and the webserver in another?
    2 projects | /r/docker | 8 Mar 2023
    We use the nginx-proxy docker image with its acme-companion to have an auto configuring SSL reverse proxy, so it's really easy to deploy images (we do it based on a merge PR into protected release branches).
  • adding an SSL cert to a docker container
    1 project | /r/docker | 14 Jan 2023
    Use a reverse proxy to handle TLS/SSL encryption. I find nginx-proxy with companion easy to use, just follow steps 1, 2, 3.
  • 502 Bad Gateway: Nginx Reverse Proxy + Docker + Let's Encrypt + Wordpress
    1 project | /r/homelab | 31 Dec 2022
    Where I'm running into issues is with the two stacks I have deployed - one is a wordpress stack which uses the wordpress image along with a db image (going by the docs here), and the other is the nginx-proxy and acme-companion (going by the docs here).
  • dockerfile for httpd
    2 projects | /r/docker | 30 Dec 2022
    Just use nginx-proxy and the LetsEncrypt companion as reverse proxy to handle TLS/SSL in front of your web server.
  • nginx-proxy-manager abandoned?
    5 projects | /r/selfhosted | 7 Nov 2022
    You can simply use this proxy container which automatically generates nginx config based on envs set in your containers. There is also a companion container which takes care of your certs. https://github.com/nginx-proxy/nginx-proxy https://github.com/nginx-proxy/acme-companion
  • Tools for automation and daily tasks
    12 projects | /r/automation | 31 Oct 2022
    https://github.com/nginx-proxy/acme-companion https://github.com/nginx-proxy/docker-gen https://github.com/projectdiscovery/dnsx https://github.com/projectdiscovery/httpx https://github.com/projectdiscovery/mapcidr https://github.com/debauchee/barrier https://github.com/stedolan/jq https://github.com/ddosify/ddosify https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kind https://github.com/mailcow/mailcow-dockerized https://github.com/motiv-labs/janus

What are some alternatives?

When comparing xcaddy and acme-companion you can also consider the following projects:

caddy-crowdsec-bouncer - A Caddy module that blocks malicious traffic based on decisions made by CrowdSec.

docker-compose-letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion - Automated docker nginx proxy integrated with letsencrypt. [Moved to: https://github.com/evertramos/nginx-proxy-automation]

caddy-authorize - Authorization Plugin for Caddy v2 (JWT/PASETO)

nginx-proxy - Automated nginx proxy for Docker containers using docker-gen

caddy-ratelimit - HTTP rate limiting module for Caddy 2

Docker Compose - Define and run multi-container applications with Docker

forwardproxy - Forward proxy plugin for the Caddy web server

Nginx Proxy Manager - Docker container for managing Nginx proxy hosts with a simple, powerful interface

souin - An HTTP cache system, RFC compliant, compatible with @tyktechnologies, @traefik, @caddyserver, @go-chi, @bnkamalesh, @beego, @devfeel, @labstack, @gofiber, @go-goyave, @go-kratos, @gin-gonic, @roadrunner-server, @zalando, @zeromicro, @nginx and @apache

docker-letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion - LetsEncrypt companion container for nginx-proxy [Moved to: https://github.com/nginx-proxy/docker-letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion]

cosmo - The open-source solution to building, maintaining, and collaborating on GraphQL Federation at Scale. An alternative to Apollo Studio and GraphOS.

nginx-proxy-automation - Automated docker nginx proxy integrated with letsencrypt.