wrk | ctop | |
---|---|---|
36 | 37 | |
36,802 | 15,167 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 0.0 | |
4 months ago | 7 months ago | |
C | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
wrk
-
Ruby on Rails load testing habits
> My initial requirement was to send requests with unique parameters. To the best of my knowledge, no tool could do this.
wrk does this with lua. https://github.com/wg/wrk/blob/master/src/wrk.lua
Also even things like the venerable jmeter supported pulling parameters from a csv file.
-
Running a Billion Workflows a month with Netflix Conductor
We used wrk2, a fantastic tool to generate stable load on the server. Wrk2 improves on wrk and adds the ability to generate sustained load at a specific rate (-R parameter).
-
So how does WSGI concurrency work?
I am using a tool called wrk to make a bunch of requests to my website, and changing the concurrency of the requests drastically changes the result, with concurrency set to 1, I get 894 requests made in 10 seconds, and when I set concurrency to 10, I get 8549 requests. This linear scaling stops when increasing the concurrency more drastically (18805 requests for 100 and 19814 for 500 concurrency).
-
TcpSocket read error (with wrk)
Im creating multithreaded async http server for learning purposes and i'm facing problem when benchmarking with wrk. I get socket read errors on every connection:
-
Grasshopper – An Open Source Python Library for Load Testing
We use locust at work but I HIGHLY recommend wrk for a very robust yet simple load testing tool.
https://github.com/wg/wrk
And of course, this talk by Gil Tene is fantastic if you're interested in load testing stats https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ8ydIuPFeU
-
What tools you use for http load testing?
Good morning what tool do you use to test your infra in terms of http load ? A tool that works, I tested : - https://github.com/tsenart/vegeta but it returns 0 errors or a http_net error from Golang - LOIC (Low Orbit Ion Canon) https://github.com/NewEraCracker/LOIC but the requests do not appear in my nginx logs and I feel no slowdown - Apache Jmeter https://jmeter.apache.org/ but I can't drop my infra and I have Java socket closed errors - K6 https://k6.io/ but I can't bring down my infra with - wrk https://github.com/wg/wrk no matter what parameter I put it doesn't make enough requests per second, I put the same parameters as on a tutorial and I don't get the same result...
-
My Rust server on a $20 VPS handles 10k requests per second with no caching. Is it just me or is that crazy ?
You could try to just blast it with wrk or bombardier. Can easily get around 50k requests on consumer machine.
-
[2023] Nginx proxy_pass to apache mod_php VS nginx proxy_pass to apache php-fpm vs nginx php-fpm
Sure, first I did the load testing on the same machine. The same machine ran web servers, php-fpm and ab / wrk programs.
- Dúvida sobre banco de dados
-
Six Charged in Mass Takedown of DDoS-for-Hire Sites
There are http benchmarking tools like wrk [0]. You don't need a ddos service for that.
[0] https://github.com/wg/wrk
ctop
-
Lazydocker
This does remind me of ctop as well: https://github.com/bcicen/ctop
It also let's you look at containers, resource usage graphs, their logs and even do some actions through a TUI.
-
Portainer Business Edition 5 free nodes plan will change to 3 nodes in the future.
ssh, nnn, micro and ctop is all I need on my dockerhosts
- Ctop – Top-like interface for container metrics
-
Found an amazingly handy terminal UI for both docker and docker-compose. Have actually just added the bin to my git repo with all my compose files. Great for a quick look at what is going on host machines.
My problem with ctop is, that it seems to show wrong memory usage data: https://github.com/bcicen/ctop/issues/314
- FLaNK Stack Weekly 3 April 2023
-
Portainer Alternatives?
When talk about interface and cli... I am a huge fan of ctop
-
What do you think about Portainer?
You can use CTOP. It's like a lite portainer on CLI. You can check logs, stats, restart containers.
-
Ask HN: What is the best source to learn Docker in 2023?
In the terminal, there are also a few useful projects:
- for Docker, there is ctop: https://github.com/bcicen/ctop
-
Docker 2.0 went from $11M to $135M in 2 years
> I tried portainer, awful UX experience and all good features are inside paid version.
This is interesting to me, because it doesn't quite match my experience - I've been using Portainer for around 3 years at this point and it's been pretty decent.
The worst issues that I've gotten is networking issues in some hybrid configurations with Docker Swarm (e.g. Portainer cannot reach the manager node of the cluster for a bit), or troubles configuring Traefik ingresses when managing Kubernetes (though I think the recent patch notes talked about improving the ingress section, so maybe the experience will get better with non-Nginx ingresses).
Other than that, it's been great for onboarding new people, illustrating the cluster state at a glance, easily operating with stacks and scaling/restarting services as needed, including pulling new images, viewing the logs or even connecting to containers through a web UI if need be. The webhook functionality in particular is really nice - you can just do a curl request against a given URL and that will pull the new container versions for the given image and do a redeploy, which works nicely with a variety of CI solutions.
When I last tried, initializing Nomad clusters with networking encryption was a bit less of a smooth experience (needing to essentially manage your own PKI) and the web UI felt more like a dashboard, instead of something that you could click around in, if you're a proponent of that workflow.
Rancher is probably better than both of those options, though there's a certain overhead in regards to running both that software and a full Kubernetes cluster. If Kubernetes feels like a good fit for a particular project and resources aren't an issue, definitely check it out! You can, of course, also have some success with lightweight clusters, like K3s: https://k3s.io/
I'll definitely agree that Lazydocker is a nice tool, but I wouldn't call it superior, just different (TUI vs GUI), their demo video is nice though: https://youtu.be/NICqQPxwJWw
It actually reminds me of ctop, which you might also want to check out, though it's not something that you'd manage clusters in, merely the individual containers on a node (which won't always be enough, same as Docker Compose isn't): https://github.com/bcicen/ctop
Regardless, for Kubernetes, I'm inclined to say that you'd enjoy k9s a bunch then, it has a similar TUI approach: https://k9scli.io/
-
Looking for a simple Docker dashboard
However, something like ctop may be easier to use.
What are some alternatives?
wrk2 - A constant throughput, correct latency recording variant of wrk
Plausible Analytics - Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly web analytics alternative to Google Analytics.
siege - Siege is an http load tester and benchmarking utility
colima - Container runtimes on macOS (and Linux) with minimal setup
grpcurl - Like cURL, but for gRPC: Command-line tool for interacting with gRPC servers
go-dry - DRY (don't repeat yourself) package for Go
prometheus - The Prometheus monitoring system and time series database.
minify - Go minifiers for web formats
jester - A sinatra-like web framework for Nim.
csvtk - A cross-platform, efficient and practical CSV/TSV toolkit in Golang
web-frameworks - Which is the fastest web framework?
git-time-metric - Simple, seamless, lightweight time tracking for Git