wrapcheck VS chock

Compare wrapcheck vs chock and see what are their differences.

wrapcheck

A Go linter to check that errors from external packages are wrapped (by tomarrell)

chock

Golang Result handling package (by kitd)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
wrapcheck chock
3 1
279 1
- -
3.9 7.2
3 months ago 4 months ago
Go Go
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

wrapcheck

Posts with mentions or reviews of wrapcheck. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-22.
  • Structured Logging with Slog
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Aug 2023
    This is such an infuriating problem. I'm convinced I'm using Go wrong, because I simply can't understand how this doesn't make it a toy language. Why the $expletive am I wasting 20-30 and more minutes per week of my life looking for the source of an error!?

    Have you seen https://github.com/tomarrell/wrapcheck? It's a linter than does a fairly good job of warning when an error originates from an external package but hasn't been wrapped in your codebase to make it unique or stacktraced. It comes with https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint and can even be made part of your in-editor LSP diagnostics.

    But still, it's not perfect. And so I remain convinced that I'm misunderstanding something fundamental about the language because not being able to consistently find the source of an error is such an egregious failing for a programming language.

  • Wrapcheck v2.3.0 released: Ignore package signatures
    2 projects | /r/golang | 3 Aug 2021
    If you're curious to read more, you can have a read here: https://blog.tomarrell.com/post/introducing_wrapcheck_linter_for_go

chock

Posts with mentions or reviews of chock. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-22.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing wrapcheck and chock you can also consider the following projects:

revive - 🔥 ~6x faster, stricter, configurable, extensible, and beautiful drop-in replacement for golint

json-log-explorer - UI for exploring JSON logs

emperror - The Emperor takes care of all errors personally

zap - Blazing fast, structured, leveled logging in Go.

dockle - Container Image Linter for Security, Helping build the Best-Practice Docker Image, Easy to start

Benthos - Fancy stream processing made operationally mundane

go-critic - The most opinionated Go source code linter for code audit.

golangci-lint - Fast linters Runner for Go

errcheck - errcheck checks that you checked errors.

websocketd - Turn any program that uses STDIN/STDOUT into a WebSocket server. Like inetd, but for WebSockets.

lnav - Log file navigator