woodpecker
staticman
| woodpecker | staticman | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | 10 | |
| 3,713 | 2,373 | |
| 2.7% | - | |
| 9.9 | 0.0 | |
| 5 days ago | 16 days ago | |
| Go | JavaScript | |
| Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
woodpecker
-
The worst thing about Jenkins is that it works
https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker
-
Examples of Woodpecker (CI/CD) pipelines for .NET
Is anyone using woodpecker? It's a self-hosted CI/CD server forked from Drone. Really good, and actively developed.
-
regularly updating a docker image from source across several servers
Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example: Gitea (lighter) / Gitlab (more heavy), Drone.io, Woodpecker
-
GitHub: “Human eyes” will never see the contents of your private repositories
> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline
I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/
Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/
I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...
- Woodpecker CI: simple, extensible CI engine powered by Docker
-
What self-hosted Git server ?
https://woodpecker-ci.org/ Open source clone of drone.io
-
GitHub actions top alternatives
https://www.drone.io/ or the more open fork https://woodpecker-ci.org/
-
Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
I’m trying to migrate of my personal repos from GitHub to Codeberg. The biggest problem is to find a replacement for GitHub Actions (the free offering is so generous), and my current solution for that is to self-host an instance of Woodpecker CI [1].
I’d like to see even more diversity in Git hosting beyond “let’s all migrate from X to Y”, and for that to happen, Forgejo (a soft fork of Gitea) has already began implementing federation [2].
[1]: http://woodpecker-ci.org/
-
JSON vs XML
The open source version of drone is https://woodpecker-ci.org/
- Woodpecker
staticman
-
free-for.dev
Staticman - Staticman is a Node.js application that receives user-generated content and uploads it as data files to a GitHub and/or GitLab repository, using Pull Requests.
-
Commenting system for Hugo
Staticman
-
Add A Comment System To A Jekyll Blog Using Staticman - 1 / 2
Another possible solution to add dynamic content to a GitHub website is to use staticman. On the opposite of the previous solutions using external databases, staticman creates files in your repository, updating your website statically. It is free and open-source but not as straightforward to implement as disqus. The nice thing is that it will store all your comments in your git repository, so there is no risk of losing them.
-
Setup Your Free Portfolio With A Blog Using GitHub Pages
This article is part of a series showing you how to quickly and freely build and host your own Jekyll blog on GitHub Pages. This series will also cover more advanced topics like adding a comment system directly in our code using Staticman and adding privacy-friendly but still free analytics using Umami.
-
Build A Portfolio With A Blog Using GitHub Pages
We will also cover more advanced topics like adding a comment system directly in our code using Staticman and integrating free privacy-friendly analytics using Umami.
- Selfhosted open source alternative to GitHub/GitLab
-
Show HN: I'm working on a open-source, self-host alternative to Disqus
I'm late to the game, but I'm surprised that no one has mentioned StaticMan yet:
https://github.com/eduardoboucas/staticman
Just uses Git(Hub) to triage and approve comments for your static sites, like Jekyll.
- Mardi Cuisine 20210302
-
Disqus, the Dark Commenting System
Alternatives from my notes (never used them IRL):
* https://github.com/eduardoboucas/staticman
* https://github.com/schn4ck/schnack
What are some alternatives?
drone - Gitness is an Open Source developer platform with Source Control management, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. [Moved to: https://github.com/harness/gitness]
utterances - :crystal_ball: A lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues
Jenkins - Jenkins automation server
remark42 - comment engine
gitlab-runner
commento - A fast, bloat-free comments platform (Github mirror)
github-act-runner - act as self-hosted runner
Clone-Wars - 100+ open-source clones of popular sites like Airbnb, Amazon, Instagram, Netflix, Tiktok, Spotify, Whatsapp, Youtube etc. See source code, demo links, tech stack, github stars.
Concourse - Concourse is a container-based continuous thing-doer written in Go.
pages-gem - A simple Ruby Gem to bootstrap dependencies for setting up and maintaining a local Jekyll environment in sync with GitHub Pages
onedev - Git Server with CI/CD, Kanban, and Packages. Seamless integration. Unparalleled experience.
gp-blog - This project is a showcase of how to setup a portfolio website using GitHub Pages, with the main accent put on the blogging part.