woodpecker VS snmpcollector

https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker

Is anyone using woodpecker? It's a self-hosted CI/CD server forked from Drone. Really good, and actively developed.

Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example: Gitea (lighter) / Gitlab (more heavy), Drone.io, Woodpecker

> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline

I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/

Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...

https://woodpecker-ci.org/ Open source clone of drone.io

https://www.drone.io/ or the more open fork https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I’m trying to migrate of my personal repos from GitHub to Codeberg. The biggest problem is to find a replacement for GitHub Actions (the free offering is so generous), and my current solution for that is to self-host an instance of Woodpecker CI [1].

I’d like to see even more diversity in Git hosting beyond “let’s all migrate from X to Y”, and for that to happen, Forgejo (a soft fork of Gitea) has already began implementing federation [2].

[1]: http://woodpecker-ci.org/

The open source version of drone is https://woodpecker-ci.org/

SnmpCollector is a full-featured, open-source generic SNMP data collector with a web administration interface. Simplifies the configuration needed to get data from devices with snmp support to an influxdb backend. hombre_sabio adds, "It aims to simplify the alignment for collecting data from various sources [to] send the data to the InfluxDB backend."

SNMP is great when implemented by others and you just ask your poller to fetch what you need every 30s to 5 minutes. You can go faster with SNMP but, you're stretching it. The fastest Poller i worked with is this one: https://github.com/toni-moreno/snmpcollector

At least a demo can be done with snmpcollector + influxdb (+ Grafana?). I think it allows faster polling, however if I recall, the polling interval is always configured in the measurement template itself.

One solution I tested. However I have no clue how it compares performance-wise.