woodpecker
cicada
woodpecker | cicada | |
---|---|---|
54 | 9 | |
3,694 | 560 | |
2.2% | 0.4% | |
9.9 | 9.2 | |
7 days ago | 4 months ago | |
Go | Python | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
woodpecker
-
The worst thing about Jenkins is that it works
https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker
-
Examples of Woodpecker (CI/CD) pipelines for .NET
Is anyone using woodpecker? It's a self-hosted CI/CD server forked from Drone. Really good, and actively developed.
-
regularly updating a docker image from source across several servers
Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example: Gitea (lighter) / Gitlab (more heavy), Drone.io, Woodpecker
-
GitHub: “Human eyes” will never see the contents of your private repositories
> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline
I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/
Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/
I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...
- Woodpecker CI: simple, extensible CI engine powered by Docker
-
What self-hosted Git server ?
https://woodpecker-ci.org/ Open source clone of drone.io
-
GitHub actions top alternatives
https://www.drone.io/ or the more open fork https://woodpecker-ci.org/
-
Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
I’m trying to migrate of my personal repos from GitHub to Codeberg. The biggest problem is to find a replacement for GitHub Actions (the free offering is so generous), and my current solution for that is to self-host an instance of Woodpecker CI [1].
I’d like to see even more diversity in Git hosting beyond “let’s all migrate from X to Y”, and for that to happen, Forgejo (a soft fork of Gitea) has already began implementing federation [2].
[1]: http://woodpecker-ci.org/
-
JSON vs XML
The open source version of drone is https://woodpecker-ci.org/
- Woodpecker
cicada
-
GitHub Actions Are a Problem
Not sure if related, but recently read about https://github.com/Cicada-Software/cicada which looks like to abstract GithubCI and GitlabCI.
- Cicada – Open-source cross-platform version of GitHub Actions and Gitlab CI
-
Cicada – A FOSS, Cross-Platform Version of GitHub Actions and Gitlab CI
LICENSE AGPL
https://github.com/Cicada-Software/cicada/blob/main/LICENSE
I.. wouldn't use to build commercial software.
-
Codeberg – Fast Open Source Alternative to GitHub
I'm guessing it's this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35364146 although it didn't seem to get much traction other than the one comment that matches what I found while trying to read up on it:
https://github.com/Cicada-Software/cicada/blob/main/docs/ci-...
> create a file _anywhere in your repository_ ending in .ci
uh-huh
> Note that you cannot use the pipe operator (|) with the shell command, only one command can be executed at a time
uh-huh
> To make sure that your workflow works, try pushing to your repository
so, no local runner for this, either. fantastic.
So instead of using Starlark, which a non-trivial number of folks already know, there's already editor support for, and is obviously designed to be embedded, they decided that what the world needs is another DSL. Got it.
-
Show HN: Cicada: A FOSS, Self-Hosted Alternative to GitHub Actions and Gitlab CI
Hi HN! My name is Logan Hunt, and I am the founder and CEO of Cicada. Cicada is a self-hostable CICD platform that integrates with GitHub and Gitlab, allowing you to write workflows without caring about the underlying implementation details of the platform you are using. Source code (AGPL-v3 licensed) is available here: https://github.com/Cicada-Software/cicada and the live site is available here: https://cicada.sh
With Cicada you build automation workflows using our custom DSL (domain specific langauge), built specifically for writing automation workflows. The Cicada DSL is a fully functional programming language, meaning you can use variables, if statements (coming soon!), and execute shell commands without having to write a single line of YAML. And, best of all, these workflows can work with GitHub and Gitlab without any modifications.
One of the best parts of GitHub Actions (IMO) is the ability to easily trigger workflows from many types of events such as git pushes, opening/closing pull requests, or creating a new release. With Cicada you will be able to fire off workflows for all of these events, no matter what platform you choose. Say good by to vendor lock-in!
Having used GitHub Actions, Gitlab CI, and Azure DevOps at my previous job, I found that these tools where good at describing basic automation tasks, but failed whenever you wanted to do something complex. In addition, these platforms all use YAML for configuring their workflow files, which means you need to write a shell script for anything more complex than basic linting or testing. Another inherent problem with these solutions is that they all use different YAML formats, making them incompatible with one another, further locking you in to their platform. Cicada solves that by making a single, unified format that works no matter what platform you use, and converts all the platform-specific events types into one platform-agnostic type. This means that a git push event coming from GitHub will look identical to a git push event coming from Gitlab.
Cicada is in the early stages right now. A working MVP is up and running, but it is far from complete. I've been holding off open-sourcing Cicada until later, but given the recent GitHub outages this week, I felt this would be the perfect time to do an initial "launch".
Currently Cicada is running on a small Linode server, and the workflows are ran using Docker. I've removed the white-list so anybody can run workflows for the time being, though I expect it will get swamped rather quickly, in which case I will re-add the white-list. Also, getting GitHub permissions right is hard, so for the time being, you must push to GitHub repositories that are on your personal account (and are an owner of).
Let me know what you think!
What are some alternatives?
drone - Gitness is an Open Source developer platform with Source Control management, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. [Moved to: https://github.com/harness/gitness]
forgefed - ForgeFed - Federation Protocol for Forge Services
Jenkins - Jenkins automation server
BrowserBox - 🌀 Browse the web from a browser you run on a server, rather than on your local device. Lightweight virtual browser. For security, privacy and more! By https://github.com/dosyago
gitlab-runner
gitea - Git with a cup of tea, painless self-hosted git service
github-act-runner - act as self-hosted runner
dagger - Application Delivery as Code that Runs Anywhere
Concourse - Concourse is a container-based continuous thing-doer written in Go.
onedev - Git Server with CI/CD, Kanban, and Packages. Seamless integration. Unparalleled experience.
privacy-redirect - A simple web extension that redirects Twitter, YouTube, Instagram & Google Maps requests to privacy friendly alternatives.