whatsapp-web.js VS Filestash

Node.js WhatsApp API - Since WhatsApp only offers an API for business accounts that requires multiple verification and review steps to get access, we’ll put together our own API using the whatsapp-web.js library. It will forward user messages to our API and send responses from the assistant to the user.

Using https://wwebjs.dev/ to read my whatsapp messages,

If you know how to code you can make a WhatsApp bot that automatically downloads all messages and media so you can view them without read receipts (and if they get deleted)

for Whatsapp your best bet is probably this js library: https://wwebjs.dev/

https://wwebjs.dev/ es gratis, no oficial, básicamente usa puppeteer para abrir whastappweb y utilizando la biblioteca podes interactuar con whatsappl: recibir mensajes, enviarlos, enviar sticker, clavar vistos, publicar estados, etc.

Hope this helps u op, u should definitely automate it like me, blocking people based using open ai https://github.com/pedroslopez/whatsapp-web.js/

Hi I wanted to automate sending some messages in my group every 24hr. So I got this working with whatsapp-web.js (https://wwebjs.dev/). However my concern is will whatsapp ban my account for this? has anyone else done this? Is it fine to do so. Anyone got ban? I've only one number which I'm using for whatsapp. don't want this to get banned. Thanks in advance :)

https://github.com/pedroslopez/whatsapp-web.js i tried to use this in C#, but i only managed to receive a few messages, the rest i couldn't manage to make

https://github.com/pedroslopez/whatsapp-web.js this is what i want to make in c#, it exist already in java, but i need in C#

Filestash — A Dropbox-like file manager that connects to a range of protocols and platforms: S3, FTP, SFTP, Minio, Git, WebDAV, Backblaze, LDAP and more.

I made https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash out of the need to collaborate on org mode documents with non emacs users. Once the first release was done, I got to reflect on the infamous top comment of the Dropbox HN to make an attempt at abstracting the storage aspect of Dropbox so those org document could be made stored on a FTP server, SFTP, S3, ....

> we need an abstraction for just this. "Bring your own storage"

I made exactly this: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash and there's an API from which you can abstract any kind of storage: S3, SFTP, FTP, GIT, WebDav, Samba, Local FS, NFS, Backblaze, Storj, Artifactory, .... There's even some funky ones like Mysql from which you have an abstraction where first level folders are databases, second level folders are tables and files are the actual rows

Yes, I rewrote my react app onto vanilla JS using nothing else than rxjs, didn't have the time to document it all yet but it looks like this: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash/blob/master/pub...

I'm not familiar with Cloudreve, but FileStash is a similar application often recommended on this subreddit.

I do use them on my OSS work (https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash/tree/master/pub...) which is used by many thousands of people

- [2] current state of the rewrite where you can see this pattern in action https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash-rewrite/tree/ma...

https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash

This is what I wish Dropbox was, a simple layer that make interacting with your FTP server easy so nobody has to own your data. The end game is both to be feature complete with Dropbox and be able to change every aspect of the application through plugin so everyone can get out what they want from it.

> but I don't think its the companies responsibility to give back to open source just because they use it

As someone who does quite a bit of OSS, the reality is most people are asking for things but aren't willing to pay for it. Take Microsoft, I had one of their employee asking me to support their azure stuff: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash/issues/180. When I found out the dude was actually employed by Microsoft, he started to talk some nonsense and ended up running away.