wg-securing-software-repos
RubyGems
| wg-securing-software-repos | RubyGems | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 25 | |
| 78 | 2,297 | |
| - | 0.2% | |
| 6.8 | 9.8 | |
| 17 days ago | 6 days ago | |
| Ruby | ||
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
wg-securing-software-repos
-
Making popular Ruby packages more secure
RubyGems does have gem signing, but it's not widely used.
There's a proposal for a new "one button" approach using sigstore[0].
Other ecosystems are also looking at sigstore too, and a lot of us are cooperating in the OpenSSF Securing Software Repos WG [1]. Package signing is a regular topic of discussion and there are various efforts underway.
Disclosure: I am involved with both of these.
[0] https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org/pull/2944
[1] https://github.com/ossf/wg-securing-software-repos
-
Unauthorized gem takeover for some gems
In particular, check out the Securing Software Repos WG: https://github.com/ossf/wg-securing-software-repos
So far folks have turned up from RubyGems, PyPI, NPM, Maven Central, Drupal and I'm probably forgotten someone.
RubyGems
-
Phlex is the ruby way to build your views
However, let's examine a typical partial, such as the one from the . rubygems.org search show page
- Chrome considers gems to be dangerous?
- Rubygems.org Hacked?
- Rubygems.org marked by Chrome as an “unsafe site”
-
OOP vs. services for organizing business logic: is there a third way?
github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org (26k lines): Where Ruby gems are hosted.
-
RubyGems now requires MFA for owners of top gems
If anyone is looking to do some open source contributions on a mature, production Ruby on Rails site, I highly recommend contributing to the rubygems.org project. The code is extremely clean and the repo is very, very well run.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org
- Rubygems packages found carrying out dependency confusion research
-
Making popular Ruby packages more secure
RubyGems does have gem signing, but it's not widely used.
There's a proposal for a new "one button" approach using sigstore[0].
Other ecosystems are also looking at sigstore too, and a lot of us are cooperating in the OpenSSF Securing Software Repos WG [1]. Package signing is a regular topic of discussion and there are various efforts underway.
Disclosure: I am involved with both of these.
[0] https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org/pull/2944
[1] https://github.com/ossf/wg-securing-software-repos
- Due to a bug in the yank action, it was possible for any RubyGems.org user to remove and replace certain gems even if that user was not authorized to do so.
What are some alternatives?
warehouse - The Python Package Index
Bundler
rfcs - RubyGems + Bundler RFCs
gemdiff - Find source repositories for ruby gems. Open, compare, and update outdated gem versions
gem-compare - A RubyGems plugin that compares versions of the given gem
Gem in a Box - Really simple rubygem hosting
gemstash - A RubyGems.org cache and private gem server
passwordless - 🗝 Authentication for your Rails app without the icky-ness of passwords
SharpZipLib - #ziplib is a Zip, GZip, Tar and BZip2 library written entirely in C# for the .NET platform.
Open-Source-Ruby-and-Rails-Apps - Awesome Ruby and Rails Open Source applications 🌈
rbs - Type Signature for Ruby
rubygems - Library packaging and distribution for Ruby.