wg-easy VS wg-manager

Check out wg-easy on GitHub. There is also a wg with pinole on their page. Works so easily together. https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy

sounds like you just want wg-easy.

This wg-easy?

Definitely not an OSI approved license, but does look like they made an attempt in the spirit of GPL, no?

https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy/blob/master/LICENSE.md

> You may:

Use this software for yourself;

Use this software for a company;

Modify this software, as long as you:

Publish the changes on GitHub as an open-source & linked fork;

Don't remove any links to the original project or donation pages;

You may not:

Use this software in a commercial product without a license from the original author;

wg-easy running in Docker. Then access it using WireGuard on my mobile devices.

Just plain wg-easy (wireguard with frontend). No 3rd parties involved, just me & my endpoint

I suggest running a VPN server like wireguard (very easy to install on phone and set up using https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy) and have the port open only to that. The VPN will do the rest in terms of NATing ports and whatnot.

https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy (7.6k stars)

I use wg-easy for now https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy

To add to this, I use this docker image/container for a UI version: https://github.com/perara/wg-manager

Here's an example: https://github.com/perara/wg-manager

WG manager