webhook VS woodpecker

Try this awesome tool https://github.com/adnanh/webhook and you can make any bot you wish

Something like this: https://github.com/adnanh/webhook for a low code solution. This is the just the top hit, there tons of “Linux WebHook receivers” out there. Container A has the WebHook config to run ffmpeg. Container B runs curl to trigger the WebHook. Can be instrumented with fairly simple shell script.

If all you need is a Webhook trigger, you might want to take a look at https://github.com/adnanh/webhook

I thought this is for receiving webhooks at first glance, like another alternative for node-red, n8n.io, and adnanh/webhook.

you can register a webhook on github and listen to it from your second pc using https://github.com/adnanh/webhook

I occasionally trigger playbooks using this simple go project https://github.com/adnanh/webhook.

You can do a hell of a lot with webhooks, a bit of scripting and, err, webhook.

I use https://github.com/adnanh/webhook to deploy the changes in the git repository to the server and have it run docker compose up -d. I actually just modified it this week to run the docker commands in a background queue using https://vicerveza.homeunix.net/~viric/soft/ts/ (commands are added to a queue and run in the order they were added, useful for long-running commands) this way webhook can reply that the git repository was updated on the server and the docker compose command was added to the task queue and webhook doesn't timeout.

https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker

Is anyone using woodpecker? It's a self-hosted CI/CD server forked from Drone. Really good, and actively developed.

Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example: Gitea (lighter) / Gitlab (more heavy), Drone.io, Woodpecker

> I wish it had some sort of CI like github actions or bitbucket pipeline

I use Gitea with Drone CI and it works pretty well: https://www.drone.io/

Some might also prefer the Woodpecker CI fork due to the license: https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I setup Drone as a part of my migration away from GitLab Omnibus and have no complaints so far: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/goodbye-gitlab-hello-gitea-...

https://woodpecker-ci.org/ Open source clone of drone.io

https://www.drone.io/ or the more open fork https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I’m trying to migrate of my personal repos from GitHub to Codeberg. The biggest problem is to find a replacement for GitHub Actions (the free offering is so generous), and my current solution for that is to self-host an instance of Woodpecker CI [1].

I’d like to see even more diversity in Git hosting beyond “let’s all migrate from X to Y”, and for that to happen, Forgejo (a soft fork of Gitea) has already began implementing federation [2].

[1]: http://woodpecker-ci.org/

The open source version of drone is https://woodpecker-ci.org/