web.dev VS squoosh

Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very good introduction to rendering on the web that can help you understand rendering options.

The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev

Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css

I noticed the same for Google's site https://web.dev/

The last article pushed to the feed was "Changes to the web.dev infrastructure" few months ago https://web.dev/blog/webdev-migration

The feed still there but with no updates https://web.dev/feed.xml and on the site you can see new articles published.

Is sad that on a infrastructure revamp of a modern site, the RSS feed was left out of the features list (at least for now).

Upon testing on Firefox and Mi Browser, there was no triggering of the BeforeInstallPrompt event, as expected. However, I noticed that web.dev manages to display a prompt on these browsers, even though they theoretically lack support for the BeforeInstallPrompt event.

web.dev, maintained by Google, including posts by Chrome developers and their co-workers,

In a old web.dev articleI came across the word "Incremental (Re)Hydration" which is linked to a Glimmer.js-Blog post (also called "Incremental Rendering" there) confuses me. Is Incremental (Re)Hydration the same as Progressive (Re)Hydration? Reading the Glimmer-Blog article it seems so, but in the web.devarticle it seems to be something different.

Web.dev newsletter - though it's not a weekly newsletter and it's only content from web.dev (though really high quality content)

Just open up a text edi web developers are self-taught. a website. That's what I did. Some people like this: https://web.dev

Here's another handy tool that I use: https://squoosh.app/

Squoosh: A webpage that allows you to quickly optimize images for your blog.

One of the most complete image compressor out there, squoosh.app by Google, uses web assembly for decoding/encoding images and it works pretty well.

First off you want to shrink your images. Every mb your page is the more it will hurt your score. I use https://squoosh.app/

https://squoosh.app/

Having a quick look at squoosh, it uses lossy compression of webp by default.

Size images appropriately (https://squoosh.app/ can be used for this). Ideally, the size of the image should be kept below 100 KB.

if your images a large file size, remove them from the page, reduce file size, and place new reduced file size images in their place - publish the site to bring the new pics live - clear your cache - go the page and test it (good tool to reduce image file size is Google Squoosh - https://squoosh.app/ )

I'm just exporting normally from Figma, but then using squoosh.app (browser based) to adjust quality/compression and even for making sure png files are optimized for prod.

Hey I see your friend made a clan, but this guy found a workaround here if you still need it. I just used https://squoosh.app/ to basically save a new copy of the image and that worked