web-frameworks VS application

Notably it seems that Fomo is using the raw Swoole Server (https://github.com/fomo-framework/framework/blob/a52b75abbd06c0aa6cb1ec47c4011557bc347532/src/Servers/Http.php#L21) rather than the HTTP-specific server wrapper which is what is used in the Swoole benchmark: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/blob/master/php/swoole/start.php

As an Experienced Developer (TM), I'd like to authoritatively know whether a given tech stack is "slow" or "fast", measured in requests per seconds. I'd like to find a way to correctly and objectively measure performance, but most performance suites measure a small thing in isolation. For example, The Benchmarker measures the performance of HTTP APIs, but the requests are super simple (GET request that gets a value, POST request that doesn't do anything but return a value, empty GET).

Hi friends. I've opened pull requests for the-benchmarker/web-frameworks and Go HTTP Router Benchmark. Hopefully, they will be merged soon. Here are the benchmark results that I got on my laptop from Julien Schmidt's Go HTTP Router Benchmark. For comparison, I also added Chi, GorillaMux, and HttpRouter.

The benchmark code: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks

And the httpbeast code is here: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/tree/maste...

You could use Budget with Buckets. It's free to use, but you can get a license too. Downside: it doesn't have an app (well, it does, but it's read only and sucks big time).

I use buckets https://www.budgetwithbuckets.com/

I track my balances across various sources, updating once a month. I also set my outgoings.

Funnily enough I don't really use the buckets feature too much, simply the graph over time of savings, and ability to set goals / monthly costs for review is enough.

Right now I'm testing software called Buckets, and I am liking it so far. It's a one-time payment, and the dev seems pretty cool by offering an extremely generous demo. It's kind of a hybrid between manual and automatic, with some macro import options and statement import options that can be helpful. It also has the option to import financial data automatically using SimpleFin for only a fraction of the monthly price of YNAB and Aspire. So far I'm really liking it.

Buckets - I just started to look at this app. It is very basic from what I have seen so far. And while writing this I learned the iOS app is a closed beta. Unlimited FREE trial until you determine it works for you. After that, there is a one-time fee of $49. In September the price is going up to $64.

You might look into budget with buckets

I haven't used it, but the team (person?) that makes [Buckets](https://www.budgetwithbuckets.com) makes [SimpleFIN](https://www.simplefin.org), which seems like it exposes exactly what you want: simple transaction data from arbitrary banks.

Plaid offers [transactions APIs](https://plaid.com/products/transactions/), but I guess to your point these APIs are geared towards fintech companies, not personal use.

I’ve been happy with Budget with Buckets as a YNAB alternative - https://www.budgetwithbuckets.com/