gojq
fq
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
gojq
-
To a Man with `Jq`, Everything Looks Like JSON
Yeap i've talked to itchyny quite a lot about various changes https://github.com/itchyny/gojq/issues/153 and also upstreamed quite a lot https://github.com/itchyny/gojq/issues?q=author%3Awader like custom iterators (to allow eval, own iterators and "empty" functions), query marshalling (query rewrite tricks) and a bunch of small things and bug fixes. But the largest change to add a JQValue interface is quite complex, other changes like extended literals is also a bit tricky.
Hmm weird list of changes for https://github.com/wader/gojq/compare/fq...itchyny:gojq:main but i guess it is because i haven't kept my main branch in sync. The fq branch should be based on latest gojq/main as of now. I usually try to rebase as quick as possible.
Let me know if you have any other questions or want to help out! maybe email etc as i usually don't check HN comments replies that often :)
-
Fq: Jq for Binary Formats
For query language i didn't prototype much, i know i really wanted jq as i had already used it extensively and know it was very powerful and had a terse syntax when working with structured data. I had some ideas of maybe using the C-version of jq via bindings or somehow let fq be tool that you used like this 'fq file | jq ... | fq' but it just felt strange and not very user friendly. Then i found gojq and i just felt that i have to make it work somehow, even if it would require lots of hard work and change to it (see https://github.com/wader/gojq/commits/fq, the JQValue change it probably to most interesting and support or custom iterators/functions that has been merged). And it turned out much better than i would expected, large parts becuse gojq's code is very nice and author has been very helpful.
fq
- Fq: Jq for Binary Formats
-
Scaling Kafka at Honeycomb
Ah, https://github.com/circonus-labs/fq
It was less mature in 2016 when we made the original technology choice (and is still, I'd say, probably not a Boring Technology today). With batching, Kafka is plenty fast for us!
-
Noob question : logs centralization
I’d also be tempted by something like fq (https://github.com/circonus-labs/fq) but I’ve never run it in anger.
What are some alternatives?
fq - jq for binary formats - tool, language and decoders for working with binary and text formats
jq - Command-line JSON processor [Moved to: https://github.com/jqlang/jq]
rasn - A Safe #[no_std] ASN.1 Codec Framework
faq - Format Agnostic jQ -- process various formats with libjq
gojq - Pure Go implementation of jq
Kaitai Struct - Kaitai Struct: declarative language to generate binary data parsers in C++ / C# / Go / Java / JavaScript / Lua / Nim / Perl / PHP / Python / Ruby
jq - Command-line JSON processor
nq - Unix command line queue utility
json-logs - A tool to pretty-print JSON logs, like those from zap or logrus.