vundo VS projectile

vundo is a simpler implementation: it reuses Emacs's tree and just implements the visualisation part.

undo-tree is a reimplementation of Emacs's tree based undo, that supports a visualization.

* undo-tree LOC: 4700. https://gitlab.com/tsc25/undo-tree/-/blob/master/undo-tree.e...

* vundo LOC: 1350. https://github.com/casouri/vundo/blob/master/vundo.el

Actually I put together vundo diff functionality which I use everyday; it's very simple so you can easily stick in your .emacs. Or perhaps will get added to vundo (maybe with a special color for the "diff-from" circle, or the ability to set a "from" and "to" for diffing across a few undos) . It's "on demand" rather than automatic, but I actually find it easier to get a diff buffer where I want it, then leave it as I move around the tree. Very happy with vundo.

And if you want a graphical undo without the large underlying data structure, give vundo a try. It just re-uses the same undo data structure emacs already keeps.

If you still want undo visualization, there's vundo that gives you a tree display of the state of the built-in undo: https://github.com/casouri/vundo

Is there anything like vundo for winner-mode? Or is any body have a winner-mode configuration that would behave like vundo?

Take a look at vundo:

vundo: Visualize the undo tree.

You could try vundo

I switched from undo-tree to vundo and am favorably impressed.

Submitted a PR to simplify that.

Could you explain more about this setup? I'm not familiar with "projectile". Is this https://github.com/bbatsov/projectile the same thing you're referring to?

Sounds interesting. What I've done recently is open my vim in the folder that contains all the organization's repos (the ones I've cloned) and just run ripgrep inside vim to find examples or references to whatever I've seeking. Seems performant enough even without doing anything except letting ripgrep ignore git-ignored stuff (default behavior of ripgrep).

Sure. It sounds like it's working well enough. Here's a Github issue that may be of interest to you. Apparently you can get this behavior if there's a project marker file at a higher level.

With projectile you can define custom "run", "compile", "test" commands per project. Also there are pre-defined commands for many known project types.

Thanks for your detailed explanation, but no that is no that is not the question. This is projectile: https://github.com/bbatsov/projectile

I am currently trying with perspective rather than persp-mode, as it segregates the buffer list as I like (#1 above). I've got projectile with persp-projectile, and that seems to give me what I need for project navigation (#2 probably, still not 100%). I get some help in my mode line for project focus (#3, partially).