vscode-remote-release VS ostree

It would be great, if people interested in this feature/having similar problems would consider pushing the following issue: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-remote-release/issues/8373

The other option may require that you add the Remote X11 extension to VSCode (Unless Microsoft has undone the damage they did to their OpenSSH client in the last few years in which case you could just enable X11 forwarding in your ssh options) if you're trying to execute everything from VSCode, and you would have to have a suitable browser or viewer installed on the remote server along with the xdg-utils package (or whatever contains xdg-open if you're not running Debian).

Take a look at this: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-remote-release/issues/6375

If it's "The connection to the terminal's pty host process is unresponsive, the terminals may stop working", apparently it's an old problem: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-remote-release/issues/7964

VSCode with Remote-Container extension installed.

Possibly related github issue?

This might be it.

Hello! I came across this Github issue that I think would be helpful for remote workers. It's about the possibility to connect to an existing tunnel by using the terminal of OS instead of VSCode UI. This would allow us to use tunnels as a full SSH replacement in scenarios where SSH itself isn't possible. If you think this would be helpful, please upvote the issue here: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-remote-release/issues/8238

Ansible makes mutable changes to the OS, task by task.

Nix is immutable. A new change is made entirely new, and only after the build is successful, all packages are "symlinked" to the current system.

Fedora Silverblue is based on ostree [1]. It works similarly like git, but on your root tree. But it requires you to reboot the whole system for the changes to take effect. Since Nix is just symlinked packages, you don't need to reboot the system.

More detailed explanation here [2].

[1]: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree

[2]: https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2023-07-12-intro-to-immutable-...

This one is for the ostree bug currently ongoing: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2900

This sounds related to the ostree bug.

I definitely agree that immutability offers considerable value in regards to improving security. But arguably it's insufficient to pull the win over mutable Fedora due to the losses caused by the inability to install the kernel-hardened package and the lack of UKI (Unified Kernel Image) support.

Other hardening guides mention a Unified Kernel Image as another measure to further improve security. Unfortunately, once more, this is (currently) not supported on Fedora Silverblue. I haven't seen it being done on openSUSE Aeon either. Though, once again, I'd love to be corrected!

The fedora crew is working on it through ostree though, so both fedora Silverblue and flatpak will be getting it (as well as true immutability) in the future: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2867

Aside from what has already been mentioned, Unified Kernel Image isn't supported (yet).