vscode-codicons VS kok.nvim

What this does is create a custom terminal profile for all Windows environments. It tells VS Code to use cmd.exe to open C:\cmder\vendor\init.bat, which starts up Cmder. You can set the icon to any Codicon.

I experienced something similar. After some reasearch, I found out that the prebuilt fonts from https://www.nerdfonts.com/ are not patched with all the latest codicons set. I ultimately ended up patching a font myself using font-patcher. If you want, my patched version of Fira Code is in my nvim config. I just migrated to 0.9 over the weekend and all icons in neo-tree, dap-ui and telescope are displaying properly.

I prefer using codicons for all signs in Neovim.

The default icons use codicons It's recommended to use this fork which fixes alignment issues for the terminal. If your terminal doesn't support font fallback and you need to have icons included in font you use you can patch it via Font Patcher. Simple step by step guide here.

• ⁠Font is MonoLisa (unfortunately a paid font) • ⁠I use codicons with nvim-cmp to get the nice icons in auto-completion. • ⁠In my terminal (iTerm-2 on macOS, WezTerm on Windows) I’ve increased the height of the lines to 140% so text is spaced further apart vertically.

Download and open in neovim https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-codicons/raw/main/dist/codicon.csv

Thanks! If you use the official VS Code codicons https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-codicons then this is the setup for you!

In the examples listed on this page https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim, there is a pattern overlay over the whole screen. Is there a neovim plugin that does this? Thanks.

nvim-cmp or coq_nvim is for autocompletion. Treesitter is for parsing language syntax. (I guess the most typical use case for this would be syntax highlighting.) Note that (neo)vim also has built in manual completion that you can use by setting up your omnifunc and triggering it with in insert mode .

Aw man that's not nice to hear. I have had my own struggle with lsp not gonna lie. I used to use coc until it got too slow, after struggling for like 2 days lol lsp is working fast and neat. I'd suggest you to take a look at coq https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim which claims to be fast as fuck (literally lol) and also claims to be faster than lsp (because its written using c or something). Haven't tried it personally

Coq_nvim

I'm attempting to use (coq_nvim)[https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim]. This is my config:

Does your coq_nvim and nvim-lspconfig really load? Because they have opts = true

I'd be happy for someone who knows more about this to correct me. But in my experience as well, nvim-cmp is not as good completion as vscode, its suggestions can be all over the place sometimes. I found that coq_nvim tends to better in this regard. I still prefer nvim-cmp for other reasons but you should definitely try coq_nvim out and see if you have a better experience.

Coq_nvim isn't the same as Coc.nvim. Coq is a completion plugin with lots of caching written in Python that works alongside the builtin LSP. Coc is an LSP client (and has it's own plugin ecosystem) written in Node.

There are some like https://github.com/SirVer/ultisnips and https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim. Speed is not really an issue, I guess people just prefer to have fewer dependencies and use lua which is already bundled in neovim.

Maybe using coq.nvim instead of nvim-cmp could help (?) dince it caches the LSP responses. I haven't test it, though