NCC
| vim-treesitter | NCC | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | |
| 72 | 9 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 9.8 | |
| almost 2 years ago | 4 days ago | |
| Go | Nix | |
| - | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
vim-treesitter
-
Vim Boss – Neovim
You are stating these things as though they were established facts. But they seem to be opinions. Or do you have data to back them up?
> People who are new to vim-style-editors and go to neovim are mainly people who would have gone to vim if neovim didn't exist.
It seems reasonable to assume that a lot of new people would not pick up either Vim or Neovim without LSP integration and Tree-sitter.
Vim has adopted a lot of the early features of Neovim and now Vim9 also has virtual text for rendering LSP diagnostics in the buffer[1] and there is a Vim9 LSP plugin too. But it does not at all seem likely that Vim would have these things were it not for the push from Neovim.
Besides, it looks like Vim still does not have mature support for Tree-sitter.[2]
> Well, the prevalent wisdom of 30+ years of FOSS has been that they're mostly bad.
There are many famous forks from the past 30 years that hardly anybody calls bad. Some examples: Net/Free/OpenBSD, GNU/XEmacs, Open/LibreSSL. These projects allowed people with different goals or values to carry on in their own directions, while also motivating each other to pick up development pace. They have often also shared code with each other.
[1] Which looks like this: https://sr.ht/%7Ewhynothugo/lsp_lines.nvim/
[2] One experimental plugin I came across: https://github.com/mattn/vim-treesitter
-
Bram: "Neovim has included Treesitter, which is an implementation of this. Once Vim9 is done I'll have a look at whether it is a good choice to include with Vim"
mattn might be cooking something: https://github.com/mattn/vim-treesitter
NCC
-
Vim Boss – Neovim
> Disclaimer: I'm not even user of either of (Neo)vim or Emacs. As soon as I read "programmable", I'm off. I just prefer fixed-function editor that suits my taste , a few minutes of configuration & go. But that's just me, what do I know?
Then Helix may be for you! It uses the Kakoune keybinds, which make SO MUCH SENSE compared to Vim or Emacs. And it's already pre configured and includes a lot of useful features. I have been daily driving it and it's pretty fast and good. Since it automatically uses LSPs if they are in the PATH, it requires very minimal configuration, my configuration only includes theme and some stylistic changes, you can take a look at it if you'd like: https://github.com/RGBCube/NixOSConfiguration/blob/master/ma...
What are some alternatives?
nvim-treehopper - Region selection with hints on the AST nodes of a document powered by treesitter
nix-config - ❄️ my nix config for both desktops(NixOS+macOS) and homelab servers(NixOS).
iswap.nvim - Interactively select and swap function arguments, list elements, and much more. Powered by tree-sitter.
nixos-config - KISS NixOS configuration based on Flakes & flake-parts (supports macOS too)
hop.nvim - Neovim motions on speed!
digga - A flake utility library to craft shell-, home-, and hosts- environments.
nvim-gps - Simple statusline component that shows what scope you are working inside
nixos-config - Nix configuration for macOS / NixOS with starter templates, step-by-step guides, and more ✨
Vim - The official Vim repository
fs - File system utilities for Clojure.
vim-treesitter - vim async coloring experiment
nix-config - :space_invader: NixOS configuration